Effects of Zeeman splitting on spin transportation in a three-terminal Rashba ring under a weak magnetic field
Source abstract
Abstract
Spin-dependent transport in one-dimensional (1D) three-terminal Rashba rings is investigated under a weak magnetic field, and we focus on the Zeeman splitting (ZS) effect. For this purpose, the interaction between the electron spin and the weak magnetic field has been treated by perturbation theory. ZS removes the spin degeneracy, and breaks both the time reversal symmetry and the spin reversal symmetry of the ring system. Consequently, all conductance zeros are lifted and turned into conductance dips. Aharonov-Bohm (AB) oscillations can be found in both branch conductances and the total conductance as a function of the magnetic field. In a relatively high magnetic field, the decoherence caused by ZS decreases the amplitude of the branch conductance and increases that of the total conductance. The results have been compared with those reported in the published literature, and a reasonable agreement is obtained. The conductance as a function of the Rashba spin-orbit coupling (RSOC) strength has also been investigated. As the RSOC strength increases, the role of ZS becomes weaker and weaker; ZS can even be neglected when B ≤ 0.1 T.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Quantum optics and atomic interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Physics & Information Engineering and Hebei Advanced Thin Film Laboratory, Hebei Normal University 1 , Shijiazhuang 050024, People’s Republic of China
Hebei Chemical & Pharmaceutical College 2 , Shijiazhuang 050026, People’s Republic of China
Funding
Natural Science Research Project of Education Department of Hebei Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 69510.1063/1.124485 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 15533510.1103/physrevb.69.155335 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 07532810.1103/physrevb.72.075328 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 23531010.1103/physrevb.69.235310 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 23531610.1103/physrevb.72.235316 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 23531510.1103/physrevd.74.044036 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 11532910.1103/physrevb.74.115329 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 15532510.1103/physrevb.73.155325 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 01430310.1063/1.4772512 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 04431310.1063/1.4863466 ↗
11. Eur. Phys. J. B · 2016 · 89 · 11810.1140/epjb/e2016-70086-6 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 12533010.1103/physrevb.77.125330 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 02370210.1063/1.4813231 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 07533110.1103/physrevb.66.155109 ↗
15. Ann. Phys. · 2011 · 326 · 110710.1016/j.aop.2010.10.003 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 16431810.1063/1.4827840 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 20370310.1063/1.4902847 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 95 · 08541110.1103/physrevb.95.085411 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 16533610.1103/PhysRevB.72.165336 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 07542210.1103/physrevb.85.075422 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 23541710.1103/physrevb.87.235417 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 19544310.1103/physrevb.79.195443 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 15533410.1103/physrevb.80.155334 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 359310.1103/physrevb.45.3593 ↗