In-situ magnetization/heating electron holography to study the magnetic ordering in arrays of nickel metallic nanowires
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetic nanostructures of different size, shape, and composition possess a great potential to improve current technologies like data storage and electromagnetic sensing. In thin ferromagnetic nanowires, their magnetization behavior is dominated by the competition between magnetocrystalline anisotropy (related to the crystalline structure) and shape anisotropy. In this way electron diffraction methods like precession electron diffraction (PED) can be used to link the magnetic behavior observed by Electron Holography (EH) with its crystallinity. Using off-axis electron holography under Lorentz conditions, we can experimentally determine the magnetization distribution over neighboring nanostructures and their diamagnetic matrix. In the case of a single row of nickel nanowires within the alumina template, the thin TEM samples showed a dominant antiferromagnetic arrangement demonstrating long-range magnetostatic interactions playing a major role.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas at San Antonio 1 , San Antonio, TX, 78249, United States
National Institute of Astrophysics, Optics and Electronics, INAOE 2 , Tonantzintla, Puebla 72840, Mexico
Funding
HHS | NIH | National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities · U.S. Department of Defense · National Science Foundation · Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 50 · 06GE0110.7567/jjap.50.06ge01 ↗
2. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 200 · 33810.1016/s0304-8853(99)00375-3 ↗
3. Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2015 · 74 · 73110.1016/j.bios.2015.07.030 ↗
4. Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2010 · 26 · 172710.1016/j.bios.2010.08.001 ↗
5. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 36610.1038/nnano.2010.46 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 20240610.1063/1.4967982 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 225510.1109/tmag.2006.878392 ↗
8. Science (80-. ) · 1995 · 268 · 146610.1126/science.268.5216.1466 ↗
9. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 393 · 19910.1016/j.jmmm.2015.05.065 ↗
10. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 389 · 14410.1016/j.jmmm.2015.04.059 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 13390410.1063/1.4870289 ↗
12. Nanotechnology · 2014 · 25 · 47570210.1088/0957-4484/25/47/475702 ↗
13. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 754610.1039/c7tc02314f ↗
14. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2016
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 17240910.1063/1.4900998 ↗
16. Ultramicroscopy · 2013 · 134 · 14410.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.003 ↗
17. Ultramicroscopy · 2008 · 108 · 140110.1016/j.ultramic.2008.05.014 ↗
18. Chem. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 677110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02723 ↗
19. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 5650110.1063/1.4942954 ↗
20. J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 720 · 40110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.210 ↗
21. Mater. Charact. · 2014 · 98 · 110.1016/j.matchar.2014.08.010 ↗
22. Zeitschrift Für Krist. · 2010 · 225 · 10310.1524/zkri.2010.1205 ↗
23. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2007 · 43 · 289610.1109/tmag.2007.893843 ↗
24. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 374 · 41710.1016/j.jmmm.2014.08.048 ↗
25. Micron · 2001 · 32 · 16710.1016/s0968-4328(99)00105-5 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 118 · 2430210.1063/1.4923745 ↗
27. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. · 2009 · 79 · 130910.1002/nme.2579 ↗
28. Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2000 · 80 · 78510.1080/0950083001000180s ↗