Coherent Cherenkov-cyclotron radiation excited by an electron beam in a two-spiral metamaterial waveguide
Source abstract
Abstract
We present the analysis of a microwave generator that uses two-spiral metamaterial (MTM) plates in a below cutoff WR340 waveguide that interacts with a high-power electron beam, motivated by recent results obtained by researchers at MIT. Particle-in-cell simulations using the MAGIC code demonstrated that power levels of 12 MW are achieved in a backward wave mode at a frequency of 2.47 GHz from an anomalous Doppler instability using a 1 μs pulsed electron beam of energy 400 keV, current 82 A in a 415 G magnetic field. In addition, a backward wave with 9 MW output power is achieved at a frequency of 2.54 GHz attributed to a Cherenkov instability using a 1 μs pulsed electron beam of energy 400 keV, current 82 A in a 1200 G magnetic field. MAGIC simulations demonstrate that the beam-wave interaction electronic efficiency can be as high as 27.4%. Nonlinear simulations indicate that beam interception leads to secondary electron emission from surfaces, which makes the anomalous Doppler instability and Cherenkov instability more complicated by a shift in frequency. This work seeks to clarify some discrepancy between particle-in-cell simulations and experiments at MIT over a range of guide magnetic field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research · Microwave Engineering and Waveguides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico 1 , Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA
Key Laboratory of Physical Electronics and Devices of the Ministry of Education, Xi’an Jiaotong University 2 , 710049 Xi’an, China
Funding
Office of Naval Research · Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Opt. Express · 2003 · 11 · 72310.1364/oe.11.000723 ↗
2. Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1490110.1038/ncomms14901 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 08513210.1103/physrevb.86.085132 ↗
4. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 12311510.1063/1.4972535 ↗
5. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 03311210.1063/1.4942791 ↗
6. J. S. Hummelt, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, 2015.
7. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 02310210.1063/1.5016545 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2017 · 64 · 386310.1109/ted.2017.2722869 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2010 · 38 · 146210.1109/tps.2010.2046914 ↗
10. Sov. Phys. Rev. Usp. · 1968 · 10 · 50910.1070/pu1968v010n04abeh003699 ↗
11. 2013
12. Appl. Phys. A · 2001 · 103 · 759
13. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. · 2013 · 61 · 316910.1109/tmtt.2013.2274780 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 18390110.1103/physrevlett.89.183901 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. · 2005 · 53 · 150610.1109/tmtt.2005.845194 ↗
16. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 10330110.1063/1.4897392 ↗
17. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1995 · 87 · 5410.1016/0010-4655(95)00010-d ↗
18. 24-28, 2015
19. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. · 2010 · 58 · 264610.1109/tmtt.2010.2065310 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. E. · 2005 · 71 · 03661710.1103/physreve.71.036617 ↗
21. 2007
22. 2004
23. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2015 · 23 · 1855