Assessment of a new ZnO:Al contact to CdZnTe for X- and gamma-ray detector applications
Source abstract
Abstract
The large mismatch of the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) between the metal contact and CdZnTe exerts thermal stress at the metal/CZT interface, which causes mechanical degradation of the contact in addition to the poor adhesion of the metallic thin film to CZT. To form a reliable and stable interface, the contact material should have better adhesion and a close match of the coefficients of thermal expansion with CZT/CdTe. Here, we report on our investigations of a novel non-metallic contact layer for use in radiation detector applications. The proposed ZnO:Al contact layer offers better adhesion due to the oxide interface, higher hardness and better matching of the CTE with CZT. It has high prospects for a reliable and stable device structure that can serve as a replacement to the common metallic electrodes used today. We evaluated AZO contacts to CZT and extracted the electronic characteristics, such as resistivity and mobility-lifetime product of electrons, and compared the results of the same characterization measurements for CZT with gold contacts. The present observations showed that the characteristics of CZT detectors with AZO contacts are nearly identical to the same detectors with gold contacts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Brookhaven National Laboratory 1 , Upton, New York 11973, USA
Department of Engineering, Norfolk State University 2 , Norfolk, Virginia 23504, USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Triboulet · 2009
2. Astroparticle Phys. · 2016 · 75 · 810.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.10.009 ↗
3. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A · 2011 · 652 · 67110.1016/j.nima.2010.09.160 ↗
4. Advances in Space Research · 2012 · 50 · 110.1016/j.asr.2012.03.009 ↗
5. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A · 2015 · 784 · 37710.1016/j.nima.2014.12.110 ↗
6. Materials Science and Engineering R · 2001 · 32 · 10310.1016/s0927-796x(01)00027-4 ↗
7. SPIE · 2004 · 5540 · 181
8. Physica Status Solidi · 2005 · 2 · 158610.1002/pssc.200460839 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 01490310.1063/1.2828170 ↗
10. J. Electronic Materials · 2013 · 42 · 312910.1007/s11664-013-2681-1 ↗
11. J. Crystal Growth · 2009 · 312 · 3310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.09.035 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2011 · 58 · 194910.1109/tns.2011.2159389 ↗
13. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A · 2001 · 458 · 43110.1016/s0168-9002(00)00901-3 ↗
14. Vacuum · 2012 · 86 · 94310.1016/j.vacuum.2011.07.048 ↗
15. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A · 2004 · 527 · 48710.1016/j.nima.2004.03.200 ↗
16. Surface & Coatings Technology · 2013 · 228 · S9710.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.07.082 ↗
17. Phys. Stat. Sol. · 1969 · 33 · 25710.1002/pssb.19690330124 ↗
18. Physica B · 2001 · 308-310 · 115010.1016/s0921-4526(01)00922-x ↗
19. Scientific Reports · 2016 · 6 · 3343310.1038/srep33433 ↗
20. Scientific Reports · 2014 · 4 · 641510.1038/srep06415 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 22371510.1063/1.4839915 ↗
22. SPIE Proceedings · 2009 · 7449 · 744902–110.1117/12.828514 ↗