Clean localization super-resolution microscopy for 3D biological imaging
Source abstract
Abstract
We propose clean localization microscopy (a variant of fPALM) using a molecule filtering technique. Localization imaging involves acquiring a large number of images containing single molecule signatures followed by one-to-one mapping to render a super-resolution image. In principle, this process can be repeated for other z-planes to construct a 3D image. But, single molecules observed from off-focal planes result in false representation of their presence in the focal plane, resulting in incorrect quantification and analysis. We overcome this with a single molecule filtering technique that imposes constraints on the diffraction limited spot size of single molecules in the image plane. Calibration with sub-diffraction size beads puts a natural cutoff on the actual diffraction-limited size of single molecules in the focal plane. This helps in distinguishing beads present in the focal plane from those in the off-focal planes thereby providing an estimate of the single molecules in the focal plane. We study the distribution of actin (labeled with a photoactivatable CAGE 552 dye) in NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques · Near-Field Optical Microscopy · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science 1 Nanobioimaging Laboratory, Department of Instrumentation and Applied Physics, , Bangalore 560012, India
University of Maine 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, , Orono, Maine 04469, USA
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 2014
2. 2006
3. Biophys. Jl. · 2006 · 91 · 425810.1529/biophysj.106.091116 ↗
4. Science · 2006 · 313 · 164210.1126/science.1127344 ↗
5. Nature Methods · 2006 · 3 · 79310.1038/nmeth929 ↗
6. Optics Letters · 1994 · 19 · 78010.1364/OL.19.000780 ↗
7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1308110.1073/pnas.0406877102 ↗
8. Nature Methods · 2008 · 5 · 94310.1038/nmeth.1257 ↗
9. PNAS · 2009 · 106 · 2228710.1073/pnas.0907866106 ↗
10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2006 · 103 · 1891110.1073/pnas.0609643104 ↗
11. Biophys. J. · 2010 · 99 · 130310.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.005 ↗
12. Nature Methods · 2008 · 5 · 52710.1038/nmeth.1211 ↗
13. Nature Meth. · 2011 · 8 · 104710.1038/nmeth.1744 ↗
14. Nature · 1982 · 300 · 65810.1038/300658a0 ↗
15. Biophys. J. · 2013 · 104 · 218210.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.054 ↗
16. Biophys. J. · 1994 · 67 · 129110.1016/S0006-3495(94)80601-0 ↗
17. Science · 2008 · 319 · 81010.1126/science.1153529 ↗
18. Nature Meth. · 2014 · 11 · 25310.1038/nmeth.2843 ↗
19. PLoS ONE · 2013 · 8 · e6291810.1371/journal.pone.0062918 ↗
20. J. Microsc · 2010 · 237 · 1210.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03287.x ↗
21. Nat Methods · 2010 · 7 · 33910.1038/nmeth0510-339 ↗
22. Nature Methods · 2011 · 8 · 49910.1038/nmeth.1605 ↗
23. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 1491910.1039/c3cp52289j ↗
24. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 1013810.1021/jp0362077 ↗
25. Front. Mol. Biosci. · 2014 · 1 · 1110.3389/fmolb.2014.00011 ↗