journal article·2022-07-01Open access

An approximate inertial manifold (AIM) based closure for turbulent flows

Maryam Akram, Malik Hassanaly, Venkat Raman

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

A closure model for turbulent flows is developed based on a dynamical system theory. An appropriately discretized formulation of the governing equations is considered for this process. The key ingredient is an approximation of the system’s attractor, where all the trajectories in phase space are confined. This approximate inertial manifold based approach provides a path to track trajectories of the system in a lower-dimensional subspace. Unlike conventional coarse-graining approaches, the turbulent field is decomposed into resolved and unresolved dynamics using the properties of the governing equations. The novelty of the approach relies on the reconstruction of the unresolved field constrained by the governing equations. A posteriori tests for homogeneous isotropic turbulence and the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation show promising results for considerable dimension reduction with strong convergence properties. The proposed model outperforms the dynamic Smagorinsky model, and the computational overhead is competitive with similar approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan 1 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

Computational Science Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 , Golden, Colorado 80401, USA

Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan 3 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

Funding

Office of Naval Research · U.S. Department of Energy

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 2000 · 32 · 110.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.1 ↗
2. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow · 2002 · 23 · 71010.1016/s0142-727x(02)00167-4 ↗
3. Proc. Combust. Inst. · 2019 · 37 · 207310.1016/j.proci.2018.07.121 ↗
4. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 2006 · 38 · 45310.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092133 ↗
5. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 2018 · 50 · 53510.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045241 ↗
6. Prediction of trailing edge separation on the NASA juncture flow using wall-modeled LES
7. 2007
8. 2006
9. Phys. Fluids · 1999 · 2 · 169910.1063/1.869867 ↗
10. Phys. Fluids · 2001 · 13 · 99710.1063/1.1350896 ↗
11. Mon. Weather Rev. · 1963 · 91 · 9910.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:gcewtp>2.3.co;2 ↗
12. Phys. Fluids A · 1991 · 3 · 274610.1063/1.858164 ↗
13. Phys. Fluids A · 1991 · 3 · 176010.1063/1.857955 ↗
14. J. Fluid Mech. · 1995 · 286 · 22910.1017/s0022112095000711 ↗
15. 2001
16. Phys. Fluids · 1997 · 9 · 148510.1063/1.869271 ↗
17. Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation
18. Comput. Visualization Sci. · 2000 · 3 · 4710.1007/s007910050051 ↗
19. Phys. Fluids · 2001 · 13 · 50510.1063/1.1332391 ↗
20. Phys. Fluids · 2001 · 13 · 178410.1063/1.1367868 ↗
21. 2003
22. 2012
23. J. Fluid Mech. · 1985 · 150 · 42710.1017/s0022112085000209 ↗
24. J. Differ. Equations · 1988 · 73 · 30910.1016/0022-0396(88)90110-6 ↗
25. 1979 · 204
26. Proc. Combust. Inst. · 2019 · 37 · 224910.1016/j.proci.2018.06.209 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Fluids · 2019 · 4 · 11460810.1103/physrevfluids.4.114608 ↗
28. Math. Comput. · 2015 · 84 · 172910.1090/S0025-5718-2014-02904-9 ↗
29. J. Dyn. Differ. Equations · 1989 · 1 · 19910.1007/bf01047831 ↗
30. J. Math. Anal. Appl. · 1991 · 155 · 17710.1016/0022-247x(91)90034-w ↗
31. J. Differ. Equations · 1991 · 89 · 35510.1016/0022-0396(91)90125-s ↗
32. J. Dyn. Differ. Equations · 1989 · 1 · 24510.1007/bf01053928 ↗
33. Phys. D · 1989 · 37 · 14610.1016/0167-2789(89)90124-3 ↗
34. AIChE J. · 1998 · 44 · 157910.1002/aic.690440711 ↗
35. J. Math. Anal. Appl. · 1990 · 149 · 54010.1016/0022-247x(90)90061-j ↗
36. Phys. D · 1990 · 44 · 3810.1016/0167-2789(90)90046-r ↗
37. J. Comput. Phys. · 2020 · 409 · 10934410.1016/j.jcp.2020.109344 ↗
38. Phys. Fluids · 2021 · 33 · 03512510.1063/5.0039402 ↗
39. ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. · 1988 · 22 · 9310.1051/m2an/1988220100931 ↗
40. Journal de Math{’e}matiques Pures et Appliqu{’e}es Gauthier-Villars · 1988 · 67 · 197
41. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I · 1985 · 301 · 139
42. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. · 2005 · 26 · 121410.1137/s1064827502410633 ↗
43. J. Comput. Phys. · 2002 · 176 · 43010.1006/jcph.2002.6995 ↗
44. Phys. Fluids · 2005 · 17 · 09510610.1063/1.2047568 ↗
45. 2003 · 461
46. Phys. Fluids A · 1991 · 3 · 176610.1063/1.857956 ↗
47. J. Fluid Mech. · 1999 · 398 · 32110.1017/s0022112099006369 ↗
48. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1985 · 57 · 61710.1103/revmodphys.57.617 ↗
49. Commun. Math. Phys. · 1981 · 82 · 13710.1007/bf01206949 ↗
51. J. Fluid Mech. · 1992 · 242 · 110.1017/s0022112092002258 ↗
52. Nonlinearity · 1991 · 4 · 13510.1088/0951-7715/4/1/009 ↗