Battling Retardation and Nonlocality: The Hunt for the Ultimate Plasmonic Cascade Nanolens
Source abstract
Abstract
The plasmonic nanolens was proposed as a deterministic method to achieve high field enhancements and, hence, enable single molecule photonic devices, but experimental results have failed to live up to these expectations, and recent theoretical works have brought its long-assumed advantages into doubt. To explore the limits of cascade field enhancements, we consider possible quantum solutions (“going small”) and use phononic materials at longer wavelengths (“going large”). We find that entering the quantum plasmonic limit to enhance the size ratio between constituent nanoparticles is not a fruitful strategy, as the increased electron-surface scattering decreases the field enhancement by over an order of magnitude. Using larger nanoparticles is limited in metals by retardation, but using localized surface phonon polaritons, which can be excited in polar dielectrics, is an effective strategy due to the lower energy phonon frequency and high quality factor. We compare the nanolens against the more usual dimer configuration and find that the superior geometry depends crucially on the material used, with noble metal nanolenses unlikely to offer better performance to equivalent dimers. In contrast, SiC nanolenses can offer a larger maximum field enhancement, up to 104, compared to the corresponding dimer configuration, suggesting that future endeavors in constructing nanolenses should be based on polar dielectrics. This could have wide-ranging implications for IR/THz surface-assisted spectroscopies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Condensed Matter Theory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Instituto de Estructura de la Materia (IEM-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Maier S. A. · 200710.1007/0-387-37825-1 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.22740210.1103/PhysRevLett.91.227402 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr100313v10.1021/cr100313v ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat262910.1038/nmat2629 ↗
5. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.24410.1038/nphoton.2012.244 ↗
6. Le Ru E. · 2008
7. 10.1021/ja711074n10.1021/ja711074n ↗
8. 10.1021/ac800221510.1021/ac8002215 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja910119810.1021/ja9101198 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.24680610.1103/PhysRevLett.105.246806 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.01740210.1103/PhysRevLett.109.017402 ↗
12. 10.1126/sciadv.150048710.1126/sciadv.1500487 ↗
13. 10.1039/C6RA23301E10.1039/C6RA23301E ↗
14. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0094610.1021/acsphotonics.6b00946 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0733610.1021/acsnano.6b07336 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20180174810.1002/anie.201801748 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.07970110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.079701 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.11541910.1103/PhysRevB.77.115419 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.09740310.1103/PhysRevLett.103.097403 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp204261u10.1021/jp204261u ↗
21. 10.1364/OE.20.00417610.1364/OE.20.004176 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.09390110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.093901 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.26390110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.263901 ↗
24. 10.1038/ncomms480910.1038/ncomms4809 ↗
25. 10.1098/rspa.2016.025810.1098/rspa.2016.0258 ↗
26. 10.1038/ncomms813210.1038/ncomms8132 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.16140710.1103/PhysRevB.90.161407 ↗
28. 10.1515/nanoph-2015-014110.1515/nanoph-2015-0141 ↗
29. 10.1109/JPROC.2016.258486010.1109/JPROC.2016.2584860 ↗
30. 10.1021/ph500269q10.1021/ph500269q ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.23541410.1103/PhysRevB.95.235414 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0025410.1021/acsphotonics.7b00254 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0740110.1021/acsnano.7b07401 ↗
34. 10.1088/2040-8986/aa708d10.1088/2040-8986/aa708d ↗
35. Kreibig U. · 2013 · 25
36. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0445110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04451 ↗
37. 10.1016/0038-1098(78)91341-810.1016/0038-1098(78)91341-8 ↗
38. 10.1088/1367-2630/5/1/15110.1088/1367-2630/5/1/151 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.15542710.1103/PhysRevB.65.155427 ↗
40. 10.1021/jz100913610.1021/jz1009136 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00257005020210.1007/s002570050202 ↗
42. 10.1021/jp801007410.1021/jp8010074 ↗
43. 10.1515/nanoph-2014-000310.1515/nanoph-2014-0003 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.11541810.1103/PhysRevB.65.115418 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.09.00910.1016/j.cpc.2011.09.009 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.03.02310.1016/j.cpc.2015.03.023 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.04541510.1103/PhysRevB.84.045415 ↗
48. 10.1038/ncomms180610.1038/ncomms1806 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.07.02510.1016/j.msec.2006.07.025 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.15680210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.156802 ↗
51. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/8/08304410.1088/1367-2630/15/8/083044 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.155810.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1558 ↗
53. Bohren C. F. · 2008
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.11541610.1103/PhysRevB.91.115416 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0746210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07462 ↗
56. 10.1021/nl048610a10.1021/nl048610a ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.15542910.1103/PhysRevB.94.155429 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0880210.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08802 ↗
59. 10.1038/nmat300410.1038/nmat3004 ↗
60. 10.1021/nl201771h10.1021/nl201771h ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.02.01910.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.02.019 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0085210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00852 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0072610.1021/acsomega.7b00726 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
65. 10.1021/jp810808h10.1021/jp810808h ↗
66. Francescato, Y. New frequencies and geometries for plasmonics and metamaterials. PhD. thesis, Imperial College London, 2014.
67. 10.1039/C5CP00351B10.1039/C5CP00351B ↗