Unusual behavior of coercivity in Hf/GdFeCo bilayer with MgO cap layer by electric current
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigate the Hf/GdFeCo bilayer with the MgO cap layer for both rare earth (RE)-rich and transition metal (TM)-rich configurations of the ferrimagnetic sublattice in the presence of the perpendicular field. We study the coercivity using the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) technique by multiple measurements on the same sample. In the first set of measurements and at low electric currents, coercivity sharply drops because of the oxygen diffusion at the interface between MgO and GdFeCo when the AHE probe current is applied. During the subsequent measurements on the RE-rich sample, we observe a moderate decrease in coercivity at low currents and the coercivity increases in a high current range. Such nonlinear dependence of coercivity on electric current can be explained by the competing interplay of the spin–orbit torque (SOT) and the Joule heating effects. On the other hand, for the TM-rich case, the SOT effect is observed over a widely applied current range.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, National Changhua University of Education 1 , Changhua, Taiwan
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology 2 , Institutskiy per. 9, 141700 Dolgoprudny, Russia
Graduate School of Materials Science, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology 3 , Douliu, Taiwan
A. M. Prokhorov General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences 4 , Vavilova 38, 119991 Moscow, Russia
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan · Russian Science Foundation
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 2011 · 476 · 18910.1038/nature10309 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 01441610.1103/PhysRevB.86.014416 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 26240710.1063/1.4859656 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 12240410.1063/1.4896225 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 08240710.1063/1.4866965 ↗
6. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1466810.1038/srep14668 ↗
7. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 33310.1038/nnano.2015.18 ↗
8. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 126610.1038/s41598-018-19656-9 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 05440110.1103/PhysRevB.84.054401 ↗
10. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2017 · 89 · 02500810.1103/RevModPhys.89.025008 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 03660110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.036601 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 06442610.1103/PhysRevB.92.064426 ↗
13. Science · 2012 · 336 · 55510.1126/science.1218197 ↗
14. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 24010.1038/nmat3522 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 12240410.1063/1.4753947 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 19240510.1063/1.4967475 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 16240910.1063/1.4919108 ↗
18. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 654810.1038/srep06548 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 14442510.1103/PhysRevB.89.144425 ↗
20. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 601710.1038/s41598-018-24480-2 ↗
21. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2017 · 396 · 70510.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.012 ↗
22. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1105010.1038/ncomms11050 ↗
23. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2009 · 45 · 380810.1109/TMAG.2009.2021845 ↗
24. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 492 · 16568810.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165688 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 26720210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.267202 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 22240110.1063/1.4903041 ↗
27. Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 17410.1038/nmat4134 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2015 · 3 · 06401210.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.064012 ↗
29. Sci. Adv. · 2017 · 3 · e160309910.1126/sciadv.1603099 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2019 · 11 · 03401810.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.034018 ↗
31. Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 177210.1038/s41598-020-58669-1 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 220402(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.73.220402 ↗
33. Tsymbal · 2011 · 55
34. 1996 · 547
35. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 02440710.1103/PhysRevB.84.024407 ↗