Theoretical analysis of induction heating in high-temperature epitaxial growth system
Source abstract
Abstract
The temperature uniformity and heating efficiency in a high-temperature epitaxial growth system were investigated by modeling and simulating. The finite element method (FEM) was used to calculate the distribution of magnetic field and temperature field in the reactor of growth system. The simulation results showed that due to the skin effect and heat conduction in the conventional susceptor, the temperature distribution of the wafer on the susceptor is not uniform. However, the temperature uniformity of the wafer can be greatly improved by adding an air gap below the wafer. The existence of air gap effectively reduced the temperature on the center of the wafer, and the effect of its radius on temperature uniformity was studied. By calculating different frequencies and coil currents, the temperature and heating rate in the reactor with modified susceptor were investigated. The results indicated that higher temperature and faster heating rate can be obtained by increasing heating frequency and coil current. However, both lower and higher frequency will bring worse temperature uniformity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Induction Heating and Inverter Technology · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Lab of Semiconductor Materials Science, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 , Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University 3 , Jinan 250100, People’s Republic of China
School of Information & Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering 4 , Handan 056038, People’s Republic of China
Funding
The National Key R&D Program of China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. B. · 2018 · 530 · 3010.1016/j.physb.2017.11.028 ↗
2. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 39 · 1337
3. Chin. Phys. B · 2015 · 24 · 02810110.1088/1674-1056/24/2/028101 ↗
4. J. Nanosci. Nanotechno. · 2016 · 16 · 516810.1166/jnn.2016.12262 ↗
5. Mat. Sci. Eng. C · 2002 · 21 · 23110.1016/s0928-4931(02)00101-7 ↗
6. Chin. Phys. B · 2017 · 26 · 10710210.1088/1674-1056/26/10/107102 ↗
7. J. Semicond. · 2005 · 26 · 10610.1016/j.patrec.2004.10.009 ↗
8. Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 110 · 396710.1063/1.3668111 ↗
9. J. Cryst. Growth · 1994 · 145 · 64210.1016/0022-0248(94)91120-7 ↗
10. J. Electron Mater. · 1997 · 26 · 24310.1007/s11664-997-0158-9 ↗
11. Mater. Lett. · 1997 · 30 · 25510.1016/s0167-577x(96)00215-7 ↗
12. IEEE T. Ind. Electron. · 2014 · 61 · 250910.1109/tie.2013.2281162 ↗
13. IBM J. Res. Dev. · 1979 · 23 · 65210.1147/rd.236.0652 ↗
14. Comput. Ind. · 1996 · 28 · 19510.1016/0166-3615(95)00072-0 ↗
15. J. Cryst. Growth · 2004 · 266 · 32010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.02.061 ↗
16. Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran. · 2010 · 53 · 241410.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.01.042 ↗
17. Chin. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 29 · 03070110.1088/0256-307X/29/3/030701 ↗
18. J. Cryst. Growth · 2015 · 421 · 6610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.04.014 ↗
19. J. Cryst. Growth · 2004 · 266 · 32010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.02.061 ↗
20. J. Cryst. Growth · 2004 · 266 · 30310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.02.059 ↗
21. Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran. · 2010 · 53 · 358510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.04.030 ↗
22. J. Cryst. Growth · 2001 · 222 · 83210.1016/s0022-0248(00)01009-5 ↗
23. J. Cryst. Growth · 2013 · 368 · 2910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.01.005 ↗