Improved carrier confinement and distribution in InGaN light-emitting diodes with three-layer staggered QWs
Source abstract
Abstract
Compared with conventional InGaN Quantum Wells (QWs), staggered InGaN QWs offer improved optical and electronic properties. This work studied the carrier concentration, band structure, overlap of hole and electron wave functions, and polarization field of three-layer staggered QWs in the blue spectral region and analyzed them in detail theoretically to explore the source and the dominant mechanism for improvement. Although theoretical studies indicate that the polarization field in QWs of staggered InGaN QWs is larger, the carrier confinement effect is stronger, and the carrier distribution is more uniform. Therefore, three-layer staggered QWs can improve overlapping of the hole and electron wave functions and then enhance the recombination rate so as to increase the optical output power and electroluminescence intensity. Moreover, the performance of the staggered structure C with the lowest indium content at the center of the well is better than that of the step-staggered structure B.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Optoelectronic and Communication Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology 1 , Xiamen 361024, China
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Technologies and Devices 2 , Xiamen 361024, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province · Science and Technology Innovation Program for Graduate Student of Xiamen University of Technology · Scientific Research Project of Xiamen University of Technology
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2009 · 15 · 102810.1109/jstqe.2009.2013476 ↗
2. Science · 2005 · 308 · 127410.1126/science.1108712 ↗
3. Laser Photonics Rev. · 2017 · 11 · 160014710.1002/lpor.201600147 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 120410.1063/1.1448668 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · R1002410.1103/physrevb.56.r10024 ↗
6. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2009 · 15 · 108010.1109/jstqe.2009.2014170 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 06112010.1063/1.3075862 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 62510.1063/1.1536263 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 04110910.1063/1.3075853 ↗
10. Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · A99110.1364/oe.19.00a991 ↗
11. Opt. Mater. · 2017 · 66 · 36710.1016/j.optmat.2017.02.028 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 08350710.1063/1.4894464 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 13111410.1063/1.3493188 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 20210710.1063/1.2205731 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 02350810.1063/1.2431477 ↗
16. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2007 · 43 · 117510.1109/jqe.2007.905009 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 23541910.1103/physrevb.92.235419 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 05110610.1063/1.3300840 ↗
19. Superlattices Microstruct. · 2019 · 132 · 10616410.1016/j.spmi.2019.106164 ↗
20. Appl. Sci. · 2019 · 9 · 7710.3390/app9010077 ↗
21. Science · 2010 · 327 · 6010.1126/science.1183226 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 581510.1063/1.1368156 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 884910.1103/physrevb.60.8849 ↗
24. Phys. Status Solidi A · 2010 · 207 · 221710.1002/pssa.201026149 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 16110710.1063/1.3570656 ↗