A semi-implicit discrepancy model of Reynolds stress in a higher-order tensor basis framework for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, machine learning algorithms are becoming more widely applied in the modification of turbulence models. In this paper, with the aim of improving the prediction accuracy of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model, a semi-implicit treatment of Reynolds stress anisotropy discrepancy model is developed using a higher-order tensor basis. A deep neural network is constructed and trained based on this discrepancy model. The trained model parameters are embedded in a computational fluid dynamics solver to modify the original RANS model. Modification computations are performed for two cases: one interpolation and one extrapolation of different Reynolds numbers. For these two cases, the ability of the modified model to capture anisotropic features has been improved. Moreover, when compared with the mean velocity of large eddy simulations (LES), the root mean square error of the modified model is significantly lower than the original RANS model. Meanwhile, the modified model can better simulate flow field separation and fluctuation in the shear layer and has better prediction accuracy for the reattachment point and the mean velocity profile compared with the original RANS model. In addition, the modified model also improves the prediction accuracy for the mean pressure coefficient and mean friction coefficient of the underlying wall surface. The previously trained model is also directly performed for the modification computation of the two massive separation periodic hill flows. It is shown that the results simulated by the modified model and LES approach are more consistent in both trend and magnitude than the original RANS model and LES approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. On the simulation of turbulent flow past bluff bodies10.1016/b978-0-444-81688-7.50005-x ↗
2. Philosophies and fallacies in turbulence modeling10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.12.004 ↗
3. Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc10.1016/0094-4548(74)90150-7 ↗
4. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows
5. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
6. Reynolds stress closure for nonequilibrium effects in turbulent flows10.1063/1.3006023 ↗
7. Modeling of non-equilibrium homogeneous turbulence in rapidly compressed flows10.1007/s10494-014-9535-7 ↗
8. On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows10.1017/s0022112093002034 ↗
9. Machine learning for fluid mechanics10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
10. Feature selection and processing of turbulence modeling based on an artificial neural network10.1063/5.0022561 ↗
11. Improving the k–ω–γ–Ar transition model by the field inversion and machine learning framework10.1063/5.0008493 ↗
12. Turbulence modeling in the age of data10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547 ↗
13. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance10.1017/jfm.2016.615 ↗
14. Physics informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603 ↗
15. A neural network approach for the blind deconvolution of turbulent flows10.1017/jfm.2017.637 ↗
16. Deep fluids: A generative network for parameterized fluid simulations10.1111/cgf.13619 ↗
17. Data-driven discovery of closure models10.1137/18m1177263 ↗
18. A deep learning enabler for nonintrusive reduced order modeling of fluid flows10.1063/1.5113494 ↗
19. Deep learning methods for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows10.1063/1.5140772 ↗
20. Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils10.1063/1.5061693 ↗
21. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for prediction of regions of high Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes uncertainty10.1063/1.4927765 ↗
22. Uncertainty analysis and data-driven model advances for a jet-in-crossflow10.1115/1.4034556 ↗
23. Machine learning strategies for systems with invariance properties10.1016/j.jcp.2016.05.003 ↗
24. A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis10.1017/s0022112075003382 ↗
25. Application of deep learning method to Reynolds stress models of channel flow based on reduced-order modeling of DNS data10.1007/s42241-018-0156-9 ↗
26. Searching for turbulence models by artificial neural network10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.054604 ↗
27. A priori analysis on deep learning of subgrid-scale parameterizations for Kraichnan turbulence10.1007/s00162-019-00512-z ↗
28. Deep neural networks for data-driven LES closure models10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108910 ↗
29. A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.015 ↗
30. Sub-grid scale model classification and blending through deep learning10.1017/jfm.2019.254 ↗
31. H. Xiao, J. L. Wu, J. X. Wang, and E. G. Paterson, “Are discrepancies in RANS modeled Reynolds stresses random?,” arXiv:1606.08131 (2016).
32. Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework10.1103/physrevfluids.3.074602 ↗
33. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with explicit data-driven Reynolds stress closure can be ill-conditioned10.1017/jfm.2019.205 ↗
34. Formulation of the k–ω turbulence model revisited10.2514/1.36541 ↗
35. 2000
36. Turbulence closure modeling with data-driven techniques: Physical compatibility and consistency considerations10.1088/1367-2630/abadb3 ↗
37. Simulation of bubbly flows with special numerical treatments of the semi-conservative and fully conservative two-fluid model10.1016/j.ces.2017.08.030 ↗
38. Development and implementation of a polydispersed multiphase flow model in OpenFOAM10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.04.011 ↗
39. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models
40. A simple weight decay can improve generalization
41. Flow over periodic hills—Numerical and experimental study in a wide range of Reynolds numbers10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.05.002 ↗
42. Turbulent channel flow with periodic hill constrictions10.1007/978-3-540-33287-9 ↗
43. Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions10.1017/s0022112004002812 ↗
44. Large eddy simulation of separated flow in a streamwise periodic channel construction
45. Statistical theory for compressible turbulent shear flows, with the application to subgrid modeling10.1063/1.865552 ↗
46. New experimental results for a LES benchmark case
47. Presentation of anisotropy properties of turbulence, invariants versus eigenvalue approaches10.1080/14685240701506896 ↗