journal article·2020-12-01Open access

Curved-boundary particle-in-cell simulation for the investigation of the target erosion effect of DC magnetron sputtering system

Young Hyun Jo, Hee Sung Park, Min Young Hur, Hae June Lee

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 12

Abstract

A two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation with a curved-boundary field solver makes it possible to investigate the target erosion effects in a direct current magnetron sputtering system. The correlation between the ion flux deformation and the sputtering yield profile for the eroded target has been investigated, considering the ion energy and angle distributions. It was found that the sputtering yield profile does not change abruptly, although the ion flux profile changes sensitively with the increase in the erosion depth. The criteria for the judgment of the critical erosion depth are provided based on the sputtering yield profile.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · Ion-surface interactions and analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, Pusan National University 1 , Busan 46241, South Korea

Mechatronics R&D Center, Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. 2 , Suwon 16677, South Korea

Funding

Brain Korea 21 Four · National Research Council of Science and Technology

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Thin Solid Films · 2015 · 587 · 310.1016/j.tsf.2015.03.019 ↗
2. Appl. Sci. Convergence Technol. · 2018 · 27 · 1910.5757/asct.2018.27.1.19 ↗
3. Radiat. Eff. Lett. · 1982 · 68 · 8310.1080/01422448208226913 ↗
4. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 320 · 20910.1016/s0022-3115(03)00192-2 ↗
5. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 06520310.1088/0022-3727/42/6/065203 ↗
6. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2006 · 243 · 31310.1016/j.nimb.2005.09.018 ↗
7. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 45 · 862910.1143/jjap.45.8629 ↗
8. Plasma Processes Polym. · 2006 · 3 · 12710.1002/ppap.200500118 ↗
9. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 53 · 08800110.7567/jjap.53.088001 ↗
10. Mater. Technol. · 2011 · 26 · 1010.1179/175355511x12941605982028 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2006 · 34 · 88610.1109/tps.2006.875843 ↗
12. Thin Solid Films · 1999 · 351 · 3710.1016/s0040-6090(99)00151-0 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 121 · 06330210.1063/1.4974944 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 123 · 04330210.1063/1.5017857 ↗
15. Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2011 · 205 · S110.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.081 ↗
16. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2019 · 37 · 03130610.1116/1.5094429 ↗
17. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 33 · 428110.1143/jjap.33.4281 ↗
18. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2006 · 24 · 90810.1116/1.2198866 ↗
19. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 1996 · 14 · 272110.1116/1.580193 ↗
20. Vacuum · 2001 · 60 · 29910.1016/s0042-207x(00)00408-5 ↗
21. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2009 · 27 · 127510.1116/1.3222874 ↗
22. Coatings · 2020 · 10 · 32110.3390/coatings10040321 ↗
23. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 37 · 96510.1143/jjap.37.965 ↗
24. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 38 · 445010.1143/jjap.38.4450 ↗
25. Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2017 · 326 · 43610.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.053 ↗
26. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 32 · 114210.1088/0022-3727/32/10/311 ↗