Long-term evaluation of HVDC transmission line audible noise and its correlation with background noise
Source abstract
Abstract
The audible noise (AN) generated by corona discharge from a full-scale, high-voltage direct-current (HVDC) transmission line was evaluated over a one-year period from December 2017 to November 2018. The double bipolar HVDC transmission line using a metallic return conductor was demonstrated using a full-scale tower having a height of 21 m in Gochang, Korea. The measured AN in an outdoor environment was statistically evaluated and compared in different seasons and weather conditions. The A-weighted spectrum of the HVDC corona noise exhibited a greater distribution than the background noise above 1.0 kHz in the frequency domain. Various background noises were considered and eliminated to improve the measurement accuracy. The highest AN levels were exhibited during the spring season. Individuals in the age range of 18–60 years were randomly selected to conduct a human-perception test. The results indicated that 15% of the participants became aware of the AN from the corona discharge when it was >5 dBA greater than the background noise. The AN was <36 dBA when the conductor surface gradient was <18 kV/cm with a six-bundle sub-conductor.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI), Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) 1 , Daejeon 34056, Korea
Electrical Environment Research Center, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute 2 , Changwon 51543, Korea
Funding
Korea Electric Power Corporation
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 2016 · 64
2. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. · 2017 · 3 · 34010.17775/cseejpes.2017.00440 ↗
3. J. Electrost. · 2018 · 93 · 1010.1016/j.elstat.2018.03.002 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery · 2012 · 27 · 40110.1109/tpwrd.2011.2172003 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery · 2017 · 32 · 195410.1109/tpwrd.2016.2601642 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery · 1996 · 11 · 147510.1109/61.517506 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications · 2002 · 38 · 118210.1109/tia.2002.802931 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. · 1979 · 98 · 1000
9. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery · 1987 · 2 · 47710.1109/tpwrd.1987.4308131 ↗
10. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 36 · 308910.1088/0022-3727/36/23/034 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 114 · 20290410.1063/1.5096228 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery · 2013 · 28 · 29410.1109/tpwrd.2012.2214793 ↗
13. J. Electrost. · 1981 · 9 · 27310.1016/0304-3886(81)90015-2 ↗
14. High Voltage · 2016 · 1 · 11510.1049/hve.2016.0024 ↗
15. Energies · 2017 · 10 · 95810.3390/en10070958 ↗
16. 2015 · 1
17. Pure Appl. Chem. · 1985 · 57 · 135310.1351/pac198557091353 ↗
18. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. · 2015 · 1 · 2310.17775/cseejpes.2015.00001 ↗
19. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 11351610.1063/1.4999228 ↗
20. AIP Advances · 2017 · 7 · 10500510.1063/1.5001286 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2015 · 22 · 289810.1109/tdei.2015.004940 ↗
22. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2016 · 23 · 187210.1109/tdei.2016.005399 ↗
23. AIP Advances · 2017 · 7 · 09502010.1063/1.4998801 ↗
24. Trans. Korean Inst. Electr. Eng. · 2018 · 67 · 554
25. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. · 1977 · 98 · 31210.1109/t-pas.1977.32339 ↗
26. Crit. Care · 2013 · 17 · R18710.1186/cc12870 ↗