journal article·2018-09-01Open access

Investigation on the effect of pressure rate on formability of aluminum alloy during warm/hot sheet hydroforming

Gaoshen Cai, Chuanyu Wu, Zepu Gao, Lihui Lang, Sergei Alexandrov

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 9

Abstract

Warm/hot sheet bulging tests of 2A16-O aluminum alloy were conducted using elliptical bulging dies under various temperatures and pressure rates, in an effort to investigate the macroscopic and microscopic influence of the pressure rate on the formability and microstructural evolution of hydrobulging parts during warm/hot sheet hydroforming. The results revealed that the forming limit of the aluminum alloy was clearly influenced by the pressure rate as the temperature rose, wherein a lower pressure rate resulted in a higher forming limit. Metallographic observations and Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) analysis revealed no obvious influence of the pressure rate on the microstructure of hydrobulging parts after warm/hot sheet hydroforming. This study demonstrates that warm/hot sheet hydroforming of aluminum alloy may lead to an improved forming limit and inhibit microstructural degradation during processing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University 1 , Hangzhou 310018, China

Ningbo XingJian Space Machinery Co., Ltd. 2 , No. 369 Wanxing Road, Haishu District, Ningbo 315153, China

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University 3 , Beijing 100191, China

Institute for Problems in Mechanics of the Russian Academy of Sciences 4 , Moscow 119526, Russia

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Mater. Sci. Forum. · 2009 · 623 · 6110.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.623.61 ↗
2. J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2004 · 151 · 16510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.032 ↗
3. J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2012 · 212 · 187510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.021 ↗
4. Steel Res. Int. · 2012 · 83 · 23010.1002/srin.201100231 ↗
5. Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1985 · 21 · 3110.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
6. Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2001 · 25 · 21110.1016/s0734-743x(00)00046-4 ↗
7. J. Alloys Compd. · 2013 · 574 · 4110.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.134 ↗
8. AIP Adv · 2016 · 6 · 02502310.1063/1.4942817 ↗
9. J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 693 · 67410.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.230 ↗
10. Mater. Des. · 2018 · 154 · 5110.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.022 ↗
11. J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 739 · 59010.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.278 ↗
12. Mater. Des. · 2010 · 31 · 242210.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.053 ↗
13. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. · 2015 · 80 · 211710.1007/s00170-015-7142-y ↗
14. Mater. Des. · 2011 · 32 · 27210.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.057 ↗
15. Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2015 · 100 · 32810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.002 ↗
16. Int. J. Mater. Form. · 2015 · 8 · 21110.1007/s12289-014-1161-3 ↗
17. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. · 2008 · 48 · 55010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.06.011 ↗
18. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2017 · 88 · 287110.1007/s00170-016-8996-3 ↗
19. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2017 · 89 · 201110.1007/s00170-016-9248-2 ↗
20. Int. J. Impact. Eng. · 2011 · 38 · 40610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.01.004 ↗
21. Int. J. Plasticity. · 2015 · 66 · 10310.1016/j.ijplas.2014.06.009 ↗
22. Int. J. Plasticity. · 2017 · 94 · 19210.1016/j.ijplas.2016.02.005 ↗
23. AIP. ADV. · 2018 · 8 · 1
24. Met. Mater. Int. · 2015 · 21 · 36510.1007/s12540-015-2018-0 ↗
25. Int. J. Mater. Form. · 2017 · 10 · 25510.1007/s12289-015-1274-3 ↗