Investigation on the effect of pressure rate on formability of aluminum alloy during warm/hot sheet hydroforming
Source abstract
Abstract
Warm/hot sheet bulging tests of 2A16-O aluminum alloy were conducted using elliptical bulging dies under various temperatures and pressure rates, in an effort to investigate the macroscopic and microscopic influence of the pressure rate on the formability and microstructural evolution of hydrobulging parts during warm/hot sheet hydroforming. The results revealed that the forming limit of the aluminum alloy was clearly influenced by the pressure rate as the temperature rose, wherein a lower pressure rate resulted in a higher forming limit. Metallographic observations and Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) analysis revealed no obvious influence of the pressure rate on the microstructure of hydrobulging parts after warm/hot sheet hydroforming. This study demonstrates that warm/hot sheet hydroforming of aluminum alloy may lead to an improved forming limit and inhibit microstructural degradation during processing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University 1 , Hangzhou 310018, China
Ningbo XingJian Space Machinery Co., Ltd. 2 , No. 369 Wanxing Road, Haishu District, Ningbo 315153, China
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University 3 , Beijing 100191, China
Institute for Problems in Mechanics of the Russian Academy of Sciences 4 , Moscow 119526, Russia
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Mater. Sci. Forum. · 2009 · 623 · 6110.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.623.61 ↗
2. J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2004 · 151 · 16510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.032 ↗
3. J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2012 · 212 · 187510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.021 ↗
4. Steel Res. Int. · 2012 · 83 · 23010.1002/srin.201100231 ↗
5. Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1985 · 21 · 3110.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
6. Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2001 · 25 · 21110.1016/s0734-743x(00)00046-4 ↗
7. J. Alloys Compd. · 2013 · 574 · 4110.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.134 ↗
8. AIP Adv · 2016 · 6 · 02502310.1063/1.4942817 ↗
9. J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 693 · 67410.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.230 ↗
10. Mater. Des. · 2018 · 154 · 5110.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.022 ↗
11. J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 739 · 59010.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.278 ↗
12. Mater. Des. · 2010 · 31 · 242210.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.053 ↗
13. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. · 2015 · 80 · 211710.1007/s00170-015-7142-y ↗
14. Mater. Des. · 2011 · 32 · 27210.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.057 ↗
15. Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2015 · 100 · 32810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.002 ↗
16. Int. J. Mater. Form. · 2015 · 8 · 21110.1007/s12289-014-1161-3 ↗
17. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. · 2008 · 48 · 55010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.06.011 ↗
18. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2017 · 88 · 287110.1007/s00170-016-8996-3 ↗
19. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2017 · 89 · 201110.1007/s00170-016-9248-2 ↗
20. Int. J. Impact. Eng. · 2011 · 38 · 40610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.01.004 ↗
21. Int. J. Plasticity. · 2015 · 66 · 10310.1016/j.ijplas.2014.06.009 ↗
22. Int. J. Plasticity. · 2017 · 94 · 19210.1016/j.ijplas.2016.02.005 ↗
23. AIP. ADV. · 2018 · 8 · 1
24. Met. Mater. Int. · 2015 · 21 · 36510.1007/s12540-015-2018-0 ↗
25. Int. J. Mater. Form. · 2017 · 10 · 25510.1007/s12289-015-1274-3 ↗