journal article·2018-01-01Open access

Magnetoelectric coupling of a magnetoelectric flux gate sensor in vibration noise circumstance

Zhaoqiang Chu, Huaduo Shi, Xiangyu Gao, Jingen Wu, Shuxiang Dong

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

A magnetoelectric (ME) flux gate sensor (MEFGS) consisting of piezoelectric PMN-PT single crystals and ferromagnetic amorphous alloy ribbon in a self-differential configuration is featured with the ability of weak magnetic anomaly detection. Here, we further investigated its ME coupling and magnetic field detection performance in vibration noise circumstance, including constant frequency, impact, and random vibration noise. Experimental results show that the ME coupling coefficient of MEFGS is as high as 5700 V/cm*Oe at resonant frequency, which is several orders magnitude higher than previously reported differential ME sensors. It was also found that under constant and impact vibration noise circumstance, the noise reduction and attenuation factor of MEFGS are over 17 and 85.7%, respectively. This work is important for practical application of MEFGS in real environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Seismic Waves and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University 1 , 100871 Beijing, China

Beijing Key Laboratory for Magnetoeletric Materials and Devices (BKL-MEMD), Peking University 2 , 100871 Beijing, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 03110110.1063/1.2836410 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 481210.1063/1.1631756 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 06250210.1063/1.2007868 ↗
4. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2011 · 94 · 373810.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04659.x ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 13241010.1063/1.4799967 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 11290310.1063/1.3231614 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 09290510.1063/1.4737906 ↗
8. J. Alloy Compd. · 2012 · 519 · 110.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.093 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 23290510.1063/1.4810750 ↗
10. Sensors and Actuators A · 2012 · 183 · 1610.1016/j.sna.2012.05.049 ↗
11. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 411110.1002/adma.201100773 ↗
12. Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 160568810.1002/adma.201605688 ↗
13. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2016 · 6 · 160124410.1002/aenm.201601244 ↗
14. Sens. and Actuators A · 2017 · 260 · 20610.1016/j.sna.2017.04.017 ↗
15. Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 160602210.1002/adma.201606022 ↗
16. IEEE Ultra. Ferro. & Freq. Con. · 2011 · 58 · 154110.1109/tuffc.2011.1980 ↗
17. Chin. Sci. Bull. · 2014 · 59 · 522310.1007/s11434-014-0467-3 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 118 · 21410310.1063/1.4936263 ↗
19. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2016 · 87 · 06390410.1063/1.4953324 ↗
20. Sens. Actuators A · 2016 · 237 · 9110.1016/j.sna.2015.10.040 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 07290610.1063/1.2969794 ↗
22. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 859210.1038/s41598-017-09420-w ↗