Effect of positively charged particles on sputtering damage of organic electro-luminescent diodes with Mg:Ag alloy electrodes fabricated by facing target sputtering
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigated the influence of the positively charged particles generated during sputtering on the performances of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) with Mg:Ag alloy electrodes fabricated by sputtering. The number of positively charged particles increased by several orders of magnitude when the target current was increased from 0.1 A to 2.5 A. When a high target current was used, many positively charged particles with energies higher than the bond energy of single C–C bonds, which are typically found in organic molecules, were generated. In this situation, we observed serious OLED performance degradation. On the other hand, when a low target current was used, OLED performance degradation was not observed when the number of positively charged particles colliding with the organic underlayer increased. We concluded that sputtering damage caused by positively charged particles can be avoided by using a low target current.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Flexible Electronics Research Center, , 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan
Funding
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 64710.1021/cm402421p ↗
2. Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 131910.1002/adma.201304346 ↗
3. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 239010.1039/c3ee40388b ↗
4. Nat. Photon. · 2015 · 9 · 17410.1038/nphoton.2015.6 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 06350910.1063/1.1863451 ↗
6. Nature · 2012 · 492 · 23410.1038/nature11687 ↗
7. Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 42910.1038/nmat3012 ↗
8. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 71910.1038/nmat3635 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 15390210.1063/1.4824648 ↗
10. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. · 2015 · 53 · 37210.1002/pola.27392 ↗
11. Org. Electron. · 2010 · 11 · 32210.1016/j.orgel.2009.11.011 ↗
12. J. Phys. Con. Ser. · 2008 · 100 · 04201110.1088/1742-6596/100/4/042011 ↗
13. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 45 · L21310.1143/jjap.45.l213 ↗
14. Org. Electron. · 2014 · 15 · 278310.1016/j.orgel.2014.08.021 ↗
15. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 604710.1021/am5091066 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 18350310.1063/1.1923182 ↗
17. Thin Solid Films · 2010 · 518 · 292610.1016/j.tsf.2009.08.059 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 07330710.1063/1.3685718 ↗
19. Org. Electron. · 2011 · 12 · 161210.1016/j.orgel.2011.06.015 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 24330210.1063/1.3154556 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 06351310.1063/1.2472719 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 28410.1063/1.1535743 ↗
23. Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 393710.1002/adma.201505279 ↗
24. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 604710.1021/am5091066 ↗
25. J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 160610.1039/c1jm13569d ↗
26. J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 1526210.1039/c2jm32438e ↗
27. J. Soc. Inf. Display · 2016 · 24 · 310.1002/jsid.408 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 334310.1063/1.1359485 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 68 · 260610.1063/1.116196 ↗