Comment on “The limits of flexoelectricity in liquid crystals” [AIP Advances 1, 032120 (2011)]
Source abstract
Abstract
In their paper, using the principle of energy conservation, F. Castles, S. M. Morris, and H. J. Coles [AIP Advances 1, 032120 (2011)]10.1063/1.3624725 establish inequalities involving the elastic and dielectric constants and flexoelectric coefficients of liquid crystals. They then argue that recently measured values of flexoelectric coefficients by Harden et al. do not obey these inequalities, hence they violate the principle of energy conservation. In this comment, we point out that in their calculation, Castles et al. use an inappropriate value for an elastic constant, hence their conclusions, predicated on the outcome of this calculation, are not justified.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Liquid Crystal Research Advancements · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kent State University Liquid Crystal Institute, , Kent, OH 44242, USA
References (6)
Show source-provided references
1. The limits of flexoelectricity in liquid crystals10.1063/1.3624725 ↗
2. Giant flexoelectricity of bent-core nematic liquid crystals10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.157802 ↗
3. Piezoelectric Effects in Liquid Crystals10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.918 ↗
4. Inherent Bounds to Elasticity and Flexoelectricity of Liquid-Crystals10.1080/15421407408084818 ↗
5. Flexoelectricity in Nematic and Smectic-a Liquid-Crystals10.1063/1.323021 ↗
6. 1991 · 423