journal article·2020-01-01Open access

MTJ based magnetic sensor for current measurement in grid

Kai-Zhong Gao, Xiaolu Yin, Yi Yang, Dan Ewing, Paul J. De Rego, Sy-Hwang Liou

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

In this paper, the status and the challenges of utilizing MTJ based magnetic sensor for Grid sensing are reviewed. And it is shown with both modeling and experiment that an optimized MTJ based magnetic sensor can be utilized to monitor Grid current, particularly for each individual transmission line. Unlike the traditional approach, where the sensing element needs to be either integrated with, in contact with or near the transmission line, this measurement technique can be based on a contactless or a “remote” sensing setup, where the sensor is placed away from the Grid line. From the perspective of sensor, the sensitivity, the signal-to-noise ratio and the linearity of MTJ based magnetic sensor can all meet the requirement of application. It is demonstrated that an optimized DC measurement, in addition to AC measurement, can also be utilized for applications in the Grid system, such as solar energy generation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

International Business and Technology Service Corporation 1 , North Oaks, Minnesota 55127, USA

Western Digital Corporation 2 , Fremont, California 94539, USA

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 3 , Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, USA

Department of Energy’s National Security Campus 4 , Kansas City, Missouri 64147, USA

Department of Energy’s National Security Campus 5 , Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA

Funding

International Business and Technology Service Corporation · National Science Foundation

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. SSRN · 2019
2. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 9110.1109/tmag.2005.863772 ↗
3. 2019
4. . 2018
5. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2008 · 44 · 168701702
6. Integration of TMR sensors in silicon microneedles for magnetic measurements of neurons10.1109/tmag.2013.2239274 ↗
7. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 16522110.1088/0953-8984/19/16/165221 ↗
8. 2015 · 228
9. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 400420410.1109/tmag.2015.2439152 ↗
10. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2019 · 55 · 080013010.1109/tmag.2019.2896036 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 090010710.1109/tmag.2013.2294471 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 260810.1109/tmag.2011.2158085 ↗
13. Proc. SPIE · 2019 · 11090 · 110903H10.1117/12.2529569 ↗
14. 2019
15. International Journal of Numerical Modelling · 1996 · 9 · 29510.1002/(sici)1099-1204(199607)9:4<295::aid-jnm240>3.0.co;2-8 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2002 · 38 · 206310.1109/tmag.2002.802699 ↗
17. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2009 · 45 · 303510.1109/tmag.2009.2017260 ↗
18. Proceedings of SPIE · 2015 · 9551 · 95512N10.1117/12.2188712 ↗
19. 2001
20. . 2019