journal article·2018-07-01Open access

Experimental evidence for interlayer decoupling distance of twisted bilayer graphene

Jun Woo Jeon, Hyeonbeom Kim, Hyuntae Kim, Soobong Choi, Byung Hoon Kim

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 7

Abstract

Twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG) is two stacked single graphene sheets rotated at a specific angle. The twist angle plays an important role in the physical properties of the tBLG. In this study, we analyzed the interaction distance between two graphene layers in tBLG using Raman spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. To confirm the interaction of the upper and bottom graphenes in the tBLG, we prepared two tBLGs with twist angles of 5° and 24°. The interlayer distance was controlled by depositing a gold bar between the two graphene layers. We found that the decoupling interlayer distance of the tBLG was different depending on the twist angle (0.74 nm for 5° and 1.66 nm for 24°). This indicates that the interaction between two graphene layers is strongly coupled with small twist angle, as expected.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Incheon National University 1 , Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea

Intelligent Sensor Convergence Research Center, Incheon National University 2 , Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea

Funding

Incheon National University

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 01660210.1103/physrevlett.100.016602 ↗
2. Solid State Commun. · 2008 · 146 · 35110.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024 ↗
3. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/revmodphys.81.109 ↗
4. Science · 2008 · 321 · 38510.1126/science.1157996 ↗
5. Nature · 2005 · 438 · 20110.1038/nature04235 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 17680310.1103/physrevlett.96.176803 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 25640510.1103/physrevlett.102.256405 ↗
8. Nat. Phys. · 2011 · 7 · 94410.1038/nphys2102 ↗
9. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 407410.1021/nl102123c ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 20543310.1103/physrevb.79.205433 ↗
11. Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 215910.1038/ncomms3159 ↗
12. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1528510.1038/srep15285 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 25680210.1103/physrevlett.99.256802 ↗
14. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1069910.1038/ncomms10699 ↗
15. Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 335310.1021/nl500823k ↗
16. Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 316210.1021/nl301137k ↗
17. Nat. Phys. · 2010 · 6 · 10910.1038/nphys1463 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 19680210.1103/physrevlett.109.196802 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 12680110.1103/physrevlett.109.126801 ↗
20. Nature · 2018 · 556 · 4310.1038/nature26160 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 10720110.1103/physrevlett.119.107201 ↗
22. 2D Materials · 2017 · 5 · 01501910.1088/2053-1583/aa9640 ↗
23. Ann. Phys. (Berlin) · 2017 · 529 · 170002510.1002/andp.201700025 ↗
24. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2017 · 114 · 336410.1073/pnas.1620140114 ↗
25. Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 592310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02870 ↗
26. 2016
27. Nature · 2016 · 535 · 27110.1038/nature18304 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 24610310.1103/physrevlett.108.246103 ↗
29. Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 359410.1021/nl4013387 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 18740110.1103/physrevlett.97.187401 ↗
31. Phys. Rep. · 2009 · 473 · 5110.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003 ↗