journal article·2018-03-01Open access

Effect of surfaces similarity on contact resistance of fractal rough surfaces under cyclic loading

Yuanwen Gao, Limei Liu, Wurui Ta, Jihua Song

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 3

Abstract

Although numerous studies have shown that contact resistance depends significantly on roughness and fractal dimension, it remains elusive how they affect contact resistance between rough surfaces. The interface similarity index is first proposed to describe the similarity of the contact surfaces, which gives a good indication of the actual contact area between surfaces. We reveal that the surfaces’ similarity be an origin of contact resistance variation. The cyclic loading can increase the contact stiffness, and the contact stiffness increases with the increase of the interface similarity index. These findings explain the mechanism of surface roughness and fractal dimension on contact resistance, and also provide reference for the reliability design of the electrical connection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University 1 , Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P. R. China

Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Environment and Disaster in Western China, The Ministry of Education of China, Lanzhou University 2 , Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P. R. China

Funding

111 Progect · Fundamental Researh Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Br. J. Appl. Phys. · 1966 · 17 · 162110.1088/0508-3443/17/12/310 ↗
2. Solid-State Electronics · 1980 · 23 · 48710.1016/0038-1101(80)90086-6 ↗
3. Solid-State Electronics · 1982 · 25 · 9110.1016/0038-1101(82)90036-3 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 09190410.1063/1.2776019 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 12190510.1063/1.2356099 ↗
6. 2007
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 11210410.1063/1.3099901 ↗
8. Extreme Mechanics Letters · 2016 · 9 · 42210.1016/j.eml.2016.03.021 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 57610.1063/1.1629392 ↗
10. J. Eng. Mech. · 2015 · 143 · B4015001
11. Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 23310.1038/nmat855 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. E · 2012 · 86 · 02671010.1103/physreve.86.026710 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 10430110.1103/physrevlett.108.104301 ↗
14. J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2018 · 111 · 27710.1016/j.jmps.2017.10.019 ↗
15. J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2018 · 112 · 31810.1016/j.jmps.2017.12.010 ↗
16. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 287410.1038/s41598-017-13314-2 ↗
17. Proceedings of the IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering · 2017 · 212 · 01201510.1088/1757-899x/212/1/012015 ↗
18. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2015 · 349 · 4310.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.174 ↗
19. Wear · 2014 · 309 · 14610.1016/j.wear.2013.10.014 ↗
20. Wear · 2003 · 255 · 30910.1016/s0043-1648(03)00215-1 ↗
21. J. Trib. · 2009 · 132 · 01140110.1115/1.4000305 ↗