Accurate, rapid identification of dislocation lines in coherent diffractive imaging via a min-max optimization formulation
Source abstract
Abstract
Defects such as dislocations impact materials properties and their response during external stimuli. Imaging these defects in their native operating conditions to establish the structure-function relationship and, ultimately, to improve performance via defect engineering has remained a considerable challenge for both electron-based and x-ray-based imaging techniques. While Bragg coherent x-ray diffractive imaging (BCDI) is successful in many cases, nuances in identifying the dislocations has left manual identification as the preferred method. Derivative-based methods are also used, but they can be inaccurate and are computationally inefficient. Here we demonstrate a derivative-free method that is both more accurate and more computationally efficient than either derivative- or human-based methods for identifying 3D dislocation lines in nanocrystal images produced by BCDI. We formulate the problem as a min-max optimization problem and show exceptional accuracy for experimental images. We demonstrate a 227x speedup for a typical experimental dataset with higher accuracy over current methods. We discuss the possibility of using this algorithm as part of a sparsity-based phase retrieval process. We also provide MATLAB code for use by other researchers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory 1 , Lemont, IL 60439, USA
Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory 2 , Lemont, IL 60439, USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Physical Review Letters · 2014 · 113 · 110.1103/physrevlett.113.025504 ↗
2. Acta Materialia · 2009 · 57 · 553110.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.048 ↗
3. Scientific Reports · 2014 · 4 · 676510.1038/srep06765 ↗
4. Journal of Power Sources · 2014 · 272 · 12110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.191 ↗
5. Nature Materials · 2017 · 16 · 56510.1038/nmat4842 ↗
6. ACS Nano · 2017 · 0
7. Procedia Engineering · 2009 · 1 · 24110.1016/j.proeng.2009.06.057 ↗
8. Discuss. Faraday Soc. · 1949 · 5 · 4810.1039/df9490500048 ↗
9. Nature Materials · 2015 · 14 · 78010.1038/nmat4320 ↗
10. Nature Materials · 2004 · 3 · 71510.1038/nmat1213 ↗
11. Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2013 · 341 · 5610.1126/science.1236034 ↗
12. Scientific Reports · 2017 · 7 · 982310.1038/s41598-017-09999-0 ↗
13. Nature Materials · 2009 · 8 · 29110.1038/nmat2400 ↗
14. Nature Materials · 2013 · 12 · 72910.1038/nmat3698 ↗
15. Nature Materials · 2011 · 10 · 86210.1038/nmat3124 ↗
16. Science · 2015 · 348 · 53010.1126/science.aaa1394 ↗
17. Scientific Reports · 2017 · 7 · 4599310.1038/srep45993 ↗
18. Nature Materials · 2010 · 9 · 12010.1038/nmat2607 ↗
19. Nano Letters · 2016 · 17 · 110210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04652 ↗
20. Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2015 · 348 · 134410.1126/science.aaa1313 ↗
21. Nano Letters · 2017 · 17 · 159510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04760 ↗
22. Science · 2017 · 356 · 73910.1126/science.aam6168 ↗
23. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation · 2015 · 22 · 149810.1107/s1600577515017336 ↗
24. Optics Express · 2016 · 24 · 2471910.1364/oe.24.024719 ↗
25. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · 2001 · 13 · 1059310.1088/0953-8984/13/47/305 ↗
26. 2011
27. 2011
28. Review of Scientific Instruments · 2007 · 78 · 01130110.1063/1.2403783 ↗
29. JOSA A · 2006 · 2310.1364/josaa.23.001179 ↗
30. Physical Review B · 2003 · 68 · 14010110.1103/physrevb.68.140101 ↗
31. Procedia Computer Science · 2015 · 51 · 81510.1016/j.procs.2015.05.205 ↗
32. Nano Letters · 2015 · 15 · 4066407010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01104 ↗
33. Acta Numerica · 2013 · 22 · 110.1017/s0962492913000032 ↗
34. Derivative-free robust optimization by outer approximations