Whistler waves with electron temperature anisotropy and non-Maxwellian distribution functions
Source abstract
Abstract
The previous works on whistler waves with electron temperature anisotropy narrated the dependence on plasma parameters, however, they did not explore the reasons behind the observed differences. A comparative analysis of the whistler waves with different electron distributions has not been made to date. This paper attempts to address both these issues in detail by making a detailed comparison of the dispersion relations and growth rates of whistler waves with electron temperature anisotropy for Maxwellian, Cairns, kappa and generalized (r, q) distributions by varying the key plasma parameters for the problem under consideration. It has been found that the growth rate of whistler instability is maximum for flat-topped distribution whereas it is minimum for the Maxwellian distribution. This work not only summarizes and complements the previous work done on the whistler waves with electron temperature anisotropy but also provides a general framework to understand the linear propagation of whistler waves with electron temperature anisotropy that is applicable in all regions of space plasmas where the satellite missions have indicated their presence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Theoretical Plasma Physics Group, Quaid-i-Azam University 1 , Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
COMSATS Institute of Information Technology 2 , Park Road, Chak Shahzad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
National Center for Physics 3 , Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Department of Physics, GC University 4 , Lahore 54000, Pakistan
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Geophys. Res. · 1986 · 91 · 142410.1029/ja091ia02p01424 ↗
2. J. Geophys. Res. · 1976 · 81 · 605910.1029/ja081i034p06059 ↗
3. Astrophys. J. Lett. · 2016 · 827 · L810.3847/2041-8205/827/1/l8 ↗
4. Astrophys. J. Lett. · 2016 · 829 · L1610.3847/2041-8205/829/1/l16 ↗
5. Astrophys. J. · 2003 · 599 · 71510.1086/379225 ↗
6. Phys. Plasmas · 2005 · 12 · 12231010.1063/1.2146957 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 04500410.1103/physrevlett.102.045004 ↗
8. Magnetosheath lion roars10.1029/ja081i013p02261 ↗
9. J. Geophys. Res. · 1982 · 87 · 606010.1029/ja087ia08p06060 ↗
10. Nature · 1981 · 93 · 38410.1038/293384a0 ↗
11. Ann. Geophys. · 2006 · 24 · 172510.5194/angeo-24-1725-2006 ↗
12. Space Sci. Rev. · 1997 · 79 · 35110.1023/a:1004938001388 ↗
13. J. Geophys. Res. · 2010 · 115 · A0720610810.1029/2009ja015064 ↗
14. J. Geophys. Res. · 2014 · 119 · 1005910.1002/2014ja020476 ↗
15. Astrophys. J. · 1963 · 138 · 123110.1086/147719 ↗
16. J. Geophys. Res. · 1978 · 83 · 315110.1029/ja083ia07p03151 ↗
17. Geophys. Res. Lett. · 1994 · 21 · 182710.1029/94gl00886 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 61 · 8210.1103/physrevlett.61.82 ↗
19. Plasma Sci. · 1992 · 20 · 75610.1109/27.199524 ↗
20. Geophys. Res. Lett. · 1994 · 21 · 184310.1029/94gl00174 ↗
21. J. Geophys. Res. · 1992 · 97 · 1693510.1029/92ja01526 ↗
22. Geophys. Res. Lett. · 1995 · 22 · 270910.1029/95gl02781 ↗
23. J. Geophys. Res. · 1986 · 91 · 160910.1029/ja091ia02p01609 ↗
24. 1992 · 252
25. 1997 · 283
26. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 10212010.1063/1.4998774 ↗
27. J. Geophys. Res. · 1968 · 73 · 283910.1029/ja073i009p02839 ↗