Effect of the electrode material on the breakdown voltage and space charge distribution of propylene carbonate under impulse voltage
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reports three types of electrode materials (copper, aluminum, and stainless steel) that are used to measure the impulse breakdown voltage of propylene carbonate. The breakdown voltage of propylene carbonate with these electrode materials is different and is in decreasing order of stainless steel, copper, and aluminum. To explore how the electrode material affects the insulating properties of the liquid dielectric, the electric field distribution and space charge distribution of propylene carbonate under impulse voltage with the three electrode materials are measured on the basis of a Kerr electro-optic test. The space charge injection ability is highest for aluminum, followed by copper, and then the stainless steel electrodes. Furthermore, the electric field distortion rate decreased in the order of the aluminum, copper, and then the stainless steel electrode. This paper explains that the difference in the electric field distortion rate between the three electrode materials led to the difference in the impulse breakdown voltage of propylene carbonate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation · Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chongqing University State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment and System Security and New Technology, , Shapingba, Chongqing 400044, P. R. China
Funding
Innovative Research Groups of China · Outstanding Young Teacher Plan of Chongqing Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 1985 · EI-20 · 19910.1109/TEI.1985.348821 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 1974 · EI-9 · 4310.1109/TEI.1974.299310 ↗
3. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2003 · 10 · 94210.1109/TDEI.2003.1255770 ↗
4. X. Zhang, J. K. Nowocin, and M. Zahn, Annual Report CEIDP, (Montreal, QC, Canada,2012) pp. 700–704.10.1109/CEIDP.2012.6378877 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 08290310.1063/1.4819340 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 13290210.1063/1.4799375 ↗
7. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. · 2015 · 28 · 116710.1007/s10948-014-2677-y ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 16290610.1063/1.4826185 ↗
9. 104
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 06310410.1063/1.4908055 ↗
11. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 09720710.1063/1.4931947 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 8290510.1063/1.4929704 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 8290110.1063/1.4929504 ↗
14. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 12713610.1063/1.4939542 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2002 · 9 · 83810.1109/TDEI.2002.1115492 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2013 · 20 · 60110.1109/TDEI.2013.6508764 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 16290110.1063/1.4873341 ↗
18. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 1994 · 1 · 74710.1109/94.311720 ↗
19. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2010 · 17 · 77510.1109/TDEI.2010.5492250 ↗