journal article·2014-07-01Open access

Extraordinary acoustic transmission mediated by Helmholtz resonators

Vijay Koju, Ebony Rowe, William M. Robertson

AIP Advances· Volume 4· Issue 7

Abstract

We demonstrate perfect transmission of sound through a rigid barrier embedded with Helmholtz resonators. The resonators are confined within a waveguide and they are oriented such that one neck protrudes onto each side of the barrier. Perfect sound transmission occurs even though the open area of the necks is less than 3% of the barrier area. Maximum transmission occurs at the resonant frequency of the Helmholtz resonator. Because the dimensions of the Helmholtz resonators are much smaller than the resonant wavelength, the transmission is independent of the direction of sound on the barrier and of the relative placement of the necks. Further, we show that the transmitted sound experiences a continuous phase transition of π radians as a function of frequency through resonance. In simulations of adjacent resonators with slightly offset resonance frequencies, the phase difference leads to destructive interference. By expanding the simulation to a linear array of tuned Helmholtz resonators we show that it is possible to create an acoustic lens. The ability of Helmholtz resonator arrays to manipulate the phase of a plane acoustic wave enables a new class of sonic beam-forming devices analogous to diffractive optics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Speech and Audio Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Middle Tennessee State University 1 Computation Science Program, , Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132, USA

Middle Tennessee State University 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, , Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132, USA

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 17430110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.174301 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 16430110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.164301 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 24110210.1103/PhysRevB.71.241102 ↗
4. Nature Phys. · 2007 · 3 · 85110.1038/nphys774 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 01430110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.014301 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 24430210.1103/PhysRevLett.110.244302 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 19990110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.199901 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 05550110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.055501 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 01490910.1063/1.2951457 ↗
10. Phys. Lett. A · 2009 · 373 · 446410.1016/j.physleta.2009.10.013 ↗
11. Nature (London) · 1998 · 391 · 66710.1038/35570 ↗
12. Opt. Commun. · 2004 · 239 · 6110.1016/j.optcom.2004.05.058 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 46710.1063/1.1773362 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 10390110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.103901 ↗
15. Laser Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 2 · 35110.1002/lapl.200510006 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 16190610.1063/1.4873391 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 22740110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.227401 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 302110.1063/1.1618021 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 10740110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.107401 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 111410.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1114 ↗
21. Nature Phys. · 2006 · 2 · 50910.1038/nphys372 ↗
22. Appl. Opt. · 2005 · 44 · 233210.1364/AO.44.002332 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 60610.1063/1.124455 ↗
24. Nature (London) · 2008 · 452 · 72810.1038/nature06762 ↗
25. Phys. Rev Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 15740310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.157403 ↗
26. 2008
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 12490310.1063/1.4797501 ↗
28. Am. J. Phys. · 1982 · 50 · 113710.1119/1.12916 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 110210.1063/1.1633983 ↗