Mapping three-dimensional near-field responses with reconstruction scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) enables mapping of nanoscale field distributions in two dimensions. However, the standard s-SNOM technique lacks direct resolving ability along the vertical direction, therefore unable to provide full three-dimensional near-field responses. Here, we develop a reconstruction technique that enables s-SNOM to collect a three-dimensional response cube of near-field interaction. The technique also allows a new operational mode of s-SNOM based on the characteristic decay range of near-field interactions. As a demonstration, the bound near-field at the sides of a polaritonic boron nitride nanotube is revealed through the collection of the near-field response cube. The graphene boundary and discontinuities are revealed by the near-field decay range mapping. The reconstruction s-SNOM technique extends the capability of s-SNOM and is generally applicable for a wide range of nanoscale characterizations that are suitable for s-SNOM, such as characterizations of plasmonic and polaritonic nanostructures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Near-Field Optical Microscopy · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic Crystals and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lehigh University Department of Chemistry, , 6 E Packer Ave., Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, USA
Funding
Lehigh University
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 07390310.1103/physrevlett.94.073903 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 11680510.1103/physrevlett.101.116805 ↗
3. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 352410.1021/nl101693a ↗
4. Nat. Photonics · 2011 · 5 · 28310.1038/nphoton.2011.33 ↗
5. Nat. Photonics · 2014 · 8 · 4310.1038/nphoton.2013.323 ↗
6. Nat. Photonics · 2014 · 8 · 91910.1038/nphoton.2014.285 ↗
7. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 21 · R110.1088/0268-1242/21/5/r01 ↗
8. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2006 · 57 · 30310.1146/annurev.physchem.56.092503.141236 ↗
9. J. Microsc. · 2001 · 202 · 7710.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00794.x ↗
10. Appl. Opt. · 2006 · 45 · 619210.1364/ao.45.006192 ↗
11. Nat. Photonics · 2009 · 3 · 28710.1038/nphoton.2009.46 ↗
12. Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 1873010.1364/oe.23.018730 ↗
13. Nat. Photonics · 2016
14. Opt. Express · 2008 · 16 · 2029510.1364/oe.16.020295 ↗
15. Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 255310.1021/nl900638p ↗
16. Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 66310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04416 ↗
17. Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 1327210.1364/oe.15.013272 ↗
18. ACS Photonics · 2017
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 13110210.1063/1.4754534 ↗
20. Opt. Express · 2016 · 24 · 458210.1364/oe.24.004582 ↗
21. Opt. Commun. · 2000 · 182 · 32110.1016/s0030-4018(00)00826-9 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 508910.1063/1.1632023 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 16740310.1103/physrevlett.105.167403 ↗
24. Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 26310410.1063/1.4905207 ↗
26. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5
27. Nat. Photonics · 2009 · 3 · 28710.1038/nphoton.2009.46 ↗
28. Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 470110.1021/nl202362d ↗
29. Science · 2006 · 313 · 95110.1126/science.1130681 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 20541810.1103/physrevb.75.205418 ↗
31. Opt. Express · 2008 · 16 · 173310.1364/oe.16.001733 ↗
32. Opt. Express · 2005 · 13 · 889310.1364/opex.13.008893 ↗
33. Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 59310.1364/oe.20.000593 ↗