journal article·2015-01-01Open access

Stress reduction of Cu-doped diamond-like carbon films from ab initio calculations

Xiaowei Li, Peiling Ke, Aiying Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 1

Abstract

Structure and properties of Cu-doped diamond-like carbon films (DLC) were investigated using ab initio calculations. The effect of Cu concentrations (1.56∼7.81 at.%) on atomic bond structure was mainly analyzed to clarify the residual stress reduction mechanism. Results showed that with introducing Cu into DLC films, the residual compressive stress decreased firstly and then increased for each case with the obvious deterioration of mechanical properties, which was in agreement with the experimental results. Structural analysis revealed that the weak Cu-C bond and the relaxation of both the distorted bond angles and bond lengths accounted for the significant reduction of residual compressive stress, while at the higher Cu concentration the increase of residual stress attributed to the existence of distorted Cu-C structures and the increased fraction of distorted C-C bond lengths.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Marine Materials and Related Technologies , Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Marine Materials and Protective Technologies, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, P.R. China

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Ningbo Municipal Natural Science Foundation · Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2002 · 37 · 12910.1016/S0927-796X(02)00005-0 ↗
2. Carbon · 1998 · 36 · 55510.1016/S0008-6223(98)00062-1 ↗
3. Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2004 · 180-181 · 21310.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.10.138 ↗
4. Mater. Today · 2007 · 10 · 4410.1016/S1369-7021(06)71791-6 ↗
5. J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 2012 · 73 · 30810.1016/j.jpcs.2011.10.019 ↗
6. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 242 · 26110.1016/j.apsusc.2004.08.036 ↗
7. Carbon · 2005 · 43 · 197610.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.008 ↗
8. Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2004 · 13 · 187310.1016/j.diamond.2004.05.011 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 70 · 54310.1063/1.349653 ↗
10. J. Comput. Theor. Nanos. · 2013 · 10 · 168810.1166/jctn.2013.3110 ↗
11. Comp. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B. · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
14. Carbon · 2006 · 44 · 96210.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.009 ↗
15. Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2002 · 11 · 101510.1016/S0925-9635(01)00648-3 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 970310.1103/PhysRevB.54.9703 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 307110.1103/PhysRevB.62.3071 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 1200710.1103/PhysRevB.60.12007 ↗
19. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. · 1989 · 1 · 689
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 171810.1063/1.124836 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1990 · 65 · 190510.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1905 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1230310.1103/PhysRevB.51.12303 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 61 · 234910.1103/PhysRevB.61.2349 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 76810.1103/PhysRevLett.76.768 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1989 · 62 · 55510.1103/PhysRevLett.62.555 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 42 · 747010.1103/PhysRevB.42.7470 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 67 · 77310.1103/PhysRevLett.67.773 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · 244110.1103/PhysRevB.56.2441 ↗
29. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2013 · 273 · 67010.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.108 ↗