journal article·2014-01-01Open access

Status of surface conduction in topological insulators

Sourabh Barua, K. P. Rajeev

AIP Advances· Volume 4· Issue 1

Abstract

In this report, we scrutinize the thickness dependent resistivity data from the recent literature on electrical transport measurements in topological insulators. A linear increase in resistivity with increase in thickness is expected in the case of these materials since they have an insulating bulk and a conducting surface. However, such a trend is not seen in the resistivity versus thickness data for all the cases examined, except for some samples, where it holds for a range of thickness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topological Materials and Phenomena · Graphene research and applications · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Department of Physics, , Kanpur 208016, India

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2010 · 82 · 304510.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 ↗
2. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2011 · 83 · 105710.1103/RevModPhys.83.1057 ↗
3. Physica E · 2012 · 44 · 86010.1016/j.physe.2011.11.003 ↗
4. Nature · 2008 · 452 · 97010.1038/nature06843 ↗
5. Science · 2009 · 325 · 17810.1126/science.1173034 ↗
6. Nat. Phys. · 2009 · 5 · 39810.1038/nphys1274 ↗
7. Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 72610.1038/srep00726 ↗
8. Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 63610.1038/ncomms1639 ↗
9. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4864058 for details of calculation for the thickness dependence of resistivity for samples with varying degrees of surface and bulk conduction.
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 12130210.1103/PhysRevB.82.121302 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 21680310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.216803 ↗
12. Nat. Phys. · 2010 · 6 · 96010.1038/nphys1861 ↗
13. Science · 2010 · 329 · 82110.1126/science.1189792 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 06680310.1103/PhysRevLett.109.066803 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 24130110.1103/PhysRevB.81.241301 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 07310910.1103/PhysRevB.84.073109 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett · 2012 · 109 · 11680410.1103/PhysRevLett.109.116804 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 19530910.1103/PhysRevB.81.195309 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 20540710.1103/PhysRevB.81.205407 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 24660110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.246601 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 19520810.1103/PhysRevB.79.195208 ↗
22. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2010 · 22 · 37580110.1088/0953-8984/22/37/375801 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 24130610.1103/PhysRevB.82.241306 ↗
24. Physica E · 2012 · 44 · 91710.1016/j.physe.2011.09.011 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 01680110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.016801 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 08530310.1103/PhysRevB.80.085303 ↗
27. ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 751010.1021/nn2024607 ↗
28. Namrata Bansal, Young Seung Kim, Matthew Brahlek, Eliav Edrey, and Sheongshik Oh, arXiv:1104.5709 (2011).
29. 2011
30. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 08544210.1103/PhysRevB.87.085442 ↗
31. App. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 03210510.1063/1.3677669 ↗