journal article·2012-03-01Open access

Hot spin spots in the laser-induced demagnetization

M. S. Si, G. P. Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 2· Issue 1

Abstract

Laser-induced femtosecond magnetism or femtomagnetism simultaneously relies on two distinctive contributions: (a) the optical dipole interaction (ODI) between a laser field and a magnetic system and (b) the spin expectation value change (SEC) between two transition states. Surprisingly, up to now, no study has taken both contributions into account simultaneously. Here we do so by introducing a new concept of the optical spin generator, a product of SEC and ODI between transition states. In ferromagnetic nickel, our first-principles calculation demonstrates that the larger the value of optical spin generator is, the larger the dynamic spin moment change is. This simple generator directly links the time-dependent spin moment change \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\Delta Mz\bf k(t)$\end{document}ΔMzk(t) at every crystal-momentum k point to its intrinsic electronic structure and magnetic properties. Those hot spin spots are a direct manifestation of the optical spin generator, and should be the focus of future research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indiana State University 1 Department of Physics, , Terre Haute, Indiana 47809, USA

Lanzhou University 2 Key Laboratory for Magnetism and Magnetic Materials of the Ministry of Education, , Lanzhou 730000, China

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 2010 · 465 · 45810.1038/nature09070 ↗
2. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2010 · 82 · 273110.1103/RevModPhys.82.2731 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 425010.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4250 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 26720710.1103/PhysRevLett.95.267207 ↗
5. Nature Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 25910.1038/nmat2593 ↗
6. Nature Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 18410.1038/nmat2706 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 14040110.1103/PhysRevB.79.140401 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 11720110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.117201 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 11720110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.117201 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 15250410.1063/1.3119313 ↗
11. Nature Phys. · 2009 · 5 · 51510.1038/nphys1285 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 302510.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3025 ↗
13. Nature Phys. · 2009 · 5 · 49910.1038/nphys1315 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 21740110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.217401 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 21441510.1103/PhysRevB.80.214415 ↗
16. Europhys. Lett. · 2011 · 94 · 1700510.1209/0295-5075/94/17005 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 18040710.1103/PhysRevB.80.180407 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1974 · 9 · 489710.1103/PhysRevB.9.4897 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 23640410.1103/PhysRevLett.101.236404 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07D30510.1063/1.3058704 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07B11310.1063/1.2837248 ↗
22. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2010 · 22 · 07600510.1088/0953-8984/22/7/076005 ↗