journal article·2016-01-01Open access

A predictive model for transferability of plastic deformation through grain boundaries

T. Tsuru, Y. Shibutani, T. Hirouchi

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 1

Abstract

The material strengths of polycrystalline metals have been widely predicted according to the grain size, where yield stress is governed by slip transfer through the grain boundary (GB). The transferability of a dislocation across a GB is enormously important in the deformation process as well as the interaction between a dislocation and GB. This paper proposes a new criterion for the transferability of dislocations through a GB that considers both the intergranular crystallographic orientation of slip systems and the applied stress condition. Atomistic simulations were carried out to investigate the slip transfer event of simple bicrystals composed of Σ3(1̄12) GB than Σ3(1̄11) GBs under uniaxial deformation and to illustrate the availability of this criterion. As a result, in contrast to the predictions of conventional criteria such as the M-value, dislocations propagated more easily across the Σ3(1̄11) and Σ3(1̄12) GB under given stress states, reflecting a larger L′-value of Σ3 bicrystal associated with higher transferability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Japan Atomic Energy Agency 1 Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, , 2-4 Shirakata, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki, Japan

Osaka University 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, , 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan

UACJ Corporation 3 , 21-1 Kurome, Mikuni-cho, Sakai-shi, Fukui, Japan

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. B · 1951 · 64 · 74710.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
2. J. Iron Steel Inst. · 1953 · 174 · 25
3. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. · 1940 · 52 · 8610.1088/0959-5309/52/1/312 ↗
4. 1948 · 451
5. Philos. Mag. · 1960 · 5 · 48510.1080/14786436008238300 ↗
6. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 18 · 21210.1016/j.cossms.2014.05.003 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B. · 1996 · 54 · 699910.1103/PhysRevB.54.6999 ↗
8. Nature Mater. · 2002 · 1 · 4510.1038/nmat700 ↗
9. Science · 2003 · 301 · 135710.1126/science.1086636 ↗
10. Nature Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 39910.1038/nmat1136 ↗
11. Int. J. Plast. · 2008 · 24 · 19110.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.010 ↗
12. J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 113 · 990110.1063/1.1329672 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 01210410.1103/PhysRevB.79.012104 ↗
14. Acta Metall. · 1982 · 30 · 145310.1016/0001-6160(82)90166-3 ↗
15. Scripta Metall. · 1989 · 23 · 143110.1016/0036-9748(89)90072-0 ↗
16. Acta Metall. · 1957 · 5 · 32210.1016/0001-6160(57)90044-5 ↗
17. Acta Metall. · 1961 · 9 · 80210.1016/0001-6160(61)90183-3 ↗
18. Scripta Metall. · 1986 · 20 · 92110.1016/0036-9748(86)90467-9 ↗
19. Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 323110.1016/0001-6160(88)90058-2 ↗
20. Philos. Mag. A · 1990 · 62 · 13110.1080/01418619008244340 ↗
21. Metall. Trans. A · 1992 · 21 · 243710.1007/BF02646988 ↗
22. Acta Metall. Mater. · 1992 · 40 · 256910.1016/0956-7151(92)90326-A ↗
23. J. Solid. Mech. Mater. Eng. · 2013 · 7 · 57110.1299/jmmp.7.571 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 02410110.1103/PhysRevB.82.024101 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 07352010.1063/1.3651384 ↗
26. 1968
27. Mater. Trans. · 2013 · 54 · 158010.2320/matertrans.MH201313 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 339310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 03541510.1103/PhysRevB.75.035415 ↗
30. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2003 · 11 · 17310.1088/0965-0393/11/2/305 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗