journal article·2011-03-01Open access

A comparison of two methods for modeling large-scale data from time series as complex networks

Ying Li, Hongduo Cao, Yong Tan

AIP Advances· Volume 1· Issue 1

Abstract

In this paper, we compare two methods of mapping time series data to complex networks based on correlation coefficient and distance, respectively. These methods make use of two different physical aspects of large-scale data. We find that the method based on correlation coefficient cannot distinguish the randomness of a chaotic series from a purely random series, and it cannot express the certainty of chaos. The method based on distance can express the certainty of a chaotic series and can distinguish a chaotic series from a random series easily. Therefore, the distance method can be helpful in analyzing chaotic systems and random systems. We have also discussed the effectiveness of the distance method with noisy data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Business, SUN YAT-SEN University 1 Department of Management Science, , Guangzhou, 510275, China

University of Washington 2 Michael G. Foster of Business, , Seattle, Washington 98195-3226, USA

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Science · 1999 · 286 · 50910.1126/science.286.5439.509 ↗
2. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2002 · 74 · 4710.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 ↗
3. Nature · 1999 · 401 · 13010.1038/43601 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 23870110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.238701 ↗
5. Phys.A · 2008 · 387 · 138110.1016/j.physa.2007.10.055 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 79 · 06630310.1103/PhysRevE.79.066303 ↗
7. Articial Neural Networks - ICANN 200810.1007/978-3-540-87536-9 ↗
8. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. · 2008 · 105 · 1960110.1073/pnas.0806082105 ↗
9. C. Liu et al., arXiv: 0912.2016 (2009)
10. New Journal of Physics · 2010 · 12 · 03302510.1088/1367-2630/12/3/033025 ↗
11. 2008
12. Chaos · 2009 · 19 · 03313710.1063/1.3227736 ↗
13. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. · 2008 · 105 · 497210.1073/pnas.0709247105 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. E · 2010 · 82 · 01621010.1103/PhysRevE.82.016210 ↗