Deep learning-based reconstruction of the structure of heterogeneous composites from their temperature fields
Source abstract
Abstract
Inverse problems involving transport phenomena are ubiquitous in engineering practice, but their solution is often challenging. In this work, we build a data-driven deep learning model to predict the heterogeneous distribution of circle-shaped fillers in two-dimensional thermal composites using the temperature field in the composite as an input. The deep learning model is based on convolutional neural networks with a U-shape architecture and encoding–decoding processes. The temperature field is cast into images of 128 × 128 pixels. When the true temperature at each pixel is given, the trained model can predict the distribution of fillers with an average accuracy of over 0.979. When the true temperature is only available at 0.88% of the pixels inside the composite, the model can predict the distribution of fillers with an average accuracy of 0.94, if the temperature at the unknown pixels is obtained through the Laplace interpolation. Even if the true temperature is only available at pixels on the boundary of the composite, the average prediction accuracy of the deep learning model can still reach 0.80; the prediction accuracy of the model can be improved by incorporating true temperature in regions where the model has low prediction confidence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Thermal properties of materials · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech 1 , Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
Department of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University 2 , Hangzhou 310027, China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 2018
2. Sequential Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian elliptic inverse problems10.1007/s11222-015-9556-7 ↗
3. Convergence assessment of numerical Monte Carlo simulations in groundwater hydrology10.1029/2003wr002876 ↗
4. 2016
5. An inverse method for simultaneous estimation of thermal properties of orthotropic materials using Gaussian process regression10.1088/1742-6596/745/3/032090 ↗
6. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision
7. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
8. Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing10.1109/mci.2018.2840738 ↗
9. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning
10. Machine learning for fluid mechanics10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
11. Machine learning subsurface flow equations from data10.1007/s10596-019-09847-2 ↗
12. Predicting the effective thermal conductivities of composite materials and porous media by machine learning methods10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.082 ↗
13. Bayesian deep convolutional encoder–decoder networks for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.018 ↗
14. Deep UQ: Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.036 ↗
15. L. Jin, H. Lu, and G. Wen, “Fast uncertainty quantification of reservoir simulation with variational U-Net,” arXiv:1907.00718 (2019).
16. Seeing permeability from images: Fast prediction with convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.scib.2018.08.006 ↗
17. Linking morphology of porous media to their macroscopic permeability by deep learning10.1007/s11242-019-01352-5 ↗
18. Predicting effective diffusivity of porous media from images by deep learning10.1038/s41598-019-56309-x ↗
19. A data driven artificial neural network model for predicting radiative properties of metallic packed beds10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.01.013 ↗
20. Deep convolutional encoder-decoder networks for uncertainty quantification of dynamic multiphase flow in heterogeneous media10.1029/2018wr023528 ↗
21. Data-driven sparse sensor placement for reconstruction: Demonstrating the benefits of exploiting known patterns10.1109/mcs.2018.2810460 ↗
22. N. B. Erichson, L. Mathelin, Z. Yao, S. L. Brunton, M. W. Mahoney, and J. N. Kutz, “Shallow learning for fluid flow reconstruction with limited sensors and limited data,” arXiv:1902.07358 (2019).10.1098/rspa.2020.0097 ↗
23. Recent advances in convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 ↗
24. 2016
25. 2001 · 47
26. SegNet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation10.1109/tpami.2016.2644615 ↗
27. C. Doersch, “Tutorial on variational autoencoders,” arXiv:1606.05908 (2016).
28. A. Kendall, V. Badrinarayanan, and R. Cipolla, “Bayesian SegNet: Model uncertainty in deep convolutional encoder-decoder architectures for scene understanding,” arXiv:1511.02680 (2015).
29. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
30. V. Dumoulin and F. Visin, “A guide to convolution arithmetic for deep learning,” arXiv:1603.07285 (2016).
31. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation
32. A variational U-Net for conditional appearance and shape generation
33. Fast feature pyramids for object detection10.1109/tpami.2014.2300479 ↗
34. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning
35. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
36. An optimal control approach to find sparse data for Laplace interpolation
37. Predicting the effective thermal conductivity of composites from cross sections images using deep learning methods10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107861 ↗
38. Deep learning approaches for mining structure-property linkages in high contrast composites from simulation datasets10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.014 ↗
39. C. Wang, T. MacGillivray, G. Macnaught, G. Yang, and D. Newby, “A two-stage 3D U-Net framework for multi-class segmentation on full resolution image,” arXiv:1804.04341 (2018).10.1007/978-3-030-12029-0_21 ↗