journal article·2018-05-01Open access

Improved thermal stability of TbF3-coated sintered Nd–Fe–B magnets by electrophoretic deposition

X. J. Cao, L. Chen, S. Guo, J. H. Di, G. F. Ding, R. J. Chen, A. R. Yan, K. Z. Chen

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

Using electrophoretic deposition (EPD) method, the impact of TbF3 diffusion on the coercivity, microstructure and thermal stability of sintered Nd–Fe–B magnets with different rare earth (RE) content was investigated. In the diffused magnets with the RE content of 34 wt.%, the maximum coercivity about 28.12 kOe with less than 1.44 wt.% Tb was achieved, the coercivity temperature coefficient (β) was improved to -0.50 %/°C from -0.58 %/°C within the temperature interval 25-160 °C, and the maximum operating temperature further increased to about 160 °C. It suggested that TbF3 diffused magnets had much superior thermal stability than the annealed samples. This was attributed to the formation of the Tb-rich (Nd, Tb)2Fe14B phase in the outer region of the matrix grains and the improved Nd-rich grain boundary phase after TbF3 diffusion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Magnetic Materials and Application Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 , Ningbo 315201, China

CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Materials and Devices, Ningbo Institute of Material Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Ningbo 315201, China

College of Materials Science and Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology 3 , Qingdao 266042, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1984 · 55 · 208310.1063/1.333572 ↗
2. Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 53610.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.05.038 ↗
3. Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 198210.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.018 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 384410.1109/tmag.2005.854874 ↗
5. J. Alloys Compd. · 2014 · 612 · 18310.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.166 ↗
6. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 47 · 787610.1143/jjap.47.7876 ↗
7. J. Alloys Compd. · 2011 · 509 · 790910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.023 ↗
8. Intermetallics · 2012 · 23 · 15810.1016/j.intermet.2011.11.014 ↗
9. Scr. Mater. · 2016 · 116 · 4010.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.01.034 ↗
10. Scr. Mater. · 2017 · 131 · 2410.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.036 ↗
11. Intermetallics · 2014 · 55 · 11810.1016/j.intermet.2014.07.020 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 1986 · 59 · 87310.1063/1.336611 ↗
13. J. Alloys Compd. · 2016 · 686 · 10110.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.208 ↗
14. 2004 · 638
15. Sci. Sinter. · 2009 · 41 · 9110.2298/sos0901091c ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 486810.1063/1.370048 ↗