Quantitative analysis of hydrogen in SiO2/SiN/SiO2 stacks using atom probe tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
We have demonstrated that it is possible to reproducibly quantify hydrogen concentration in the SiN layer of a SiO2/SiN/SiO2 (ONO) stack structure using ultraviolet laser-assisted atom probe tomography (APT). The concentration of hydrogen atoms detected using APT increased gradually during the analysis, which could be explained by the effect of hydrogen adsorption from residual gas in the vacuum chamber onto the specimen surface. The amount of adsorbed hydrogen in the SiN layer was estimated by analyzing another SiN layer with an extremely low hydrogen concentration (<0.2 at. %). Thus, by subtracting the concentration of adsorbed hydrogen, the actual hydrogen concentration in the SiN layer was quantified as approximately 1.0 at. %. This result was consistent with that obtained by elastic recoil detection analysis (ERDA), which confirmed the accuracy of the APT quantification. The present results indicate that APT enables the imaging of the three-dimensional distribution of hydrogen atoms in actual devices at a sub-nanometer scale.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Renesas Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 1 Technology Division, , Ibaraki 312-8504, Japan
Renesas Electronics Corporation 2 Device Technology Division, , Ibaraki 312-8504, Japan
Tohoku University 3 The Oarai Center, Institute for Materials Research, , Ibaraki 311-1313, Japan
Tokyo Institute of Technology 4 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, , Tokyo 152-8552, Japan
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 200410.1063/1.323909 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2006 · 53 · 158310.1109/TED.2006.876041 ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 1983 · 54 · 693810.1063/1.332009 ↗
4. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 212–213 · 80410.1016/S0169-4332(03)00107-7 ↗
5. Microelectron. Eng. · 1993 · 22 · 6510.1016/0167-9317(93)90131-N ↗
6. Mater. Sci. Forum · 2007 · 539-543 · 355110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.3551 ↗
7. Surf. Sci. · 1968 · 10 · 17710.1016/0039-6028(68)90018-6 ↗
8. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2007 · 78 · 03110110.1063/1.2709758 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 1980 · 51 · 118410.1063/1.327686 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 03610210.1063/1.3544496 ↗
11. Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 57610.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.020 ↗
12. J. Electron. Mater. · 2012 · 41 · 80110.1007/s11664-011-1803-x ↗
13. Microsc. Microanal. · 2008 · 14 · 125410.1017/S1431927608083657 ↗
14. Ultramicroscopy · 2009 · 109 · 147910.1016/j.ultramic.2009.08.002 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 10350610.1063/1.2891081 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Express · 2011 · 4 · 03660110.1143/APEX.4.036601 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 13350710.1063/1.2995864 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 02350610.1063/1.4926970 ↗
19. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 1222110.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.169 ↗
20. Corros. Sci. · 2015 · 90 · 110.1016/j.corsci.2014.10.016 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 06660210.7567/APEX.6.066602 ↗
22. Ultramicroscopy · 2013 · 132 · 28510.1016/j.ultramic.2013.01.007 ↗
23. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 53 · 08LC0310.7567/JJAP.53.08LC03 ↗
24. Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 54010.1016/j.ultramic.2011.01.004 ↗