Influence of shape and dimension on magnetic anisotropies and magnetization reversal of Py, Fe, and Co nano-objects with four-fold symmetry
Source abstract
Abstract
Different magnetic anisotropies and magnetization reversal mechanisms were identified in magnetic nano-objects of four-fold symmetry, using micromagnetic simulations. Nano-particles with lateral dimensions between 50 nm and 400 nm, simulated with typical properties of permalloy, iron and cobalt, were tested in dependence of the angular orientation with respect to the externally applied magnetic field. All nano-objects exhibited steps on the sides of the hysteresis loops, which can be correlated with stable intermediate states at remanence, for some angular regions. Coercive fields were found to show an irregular and unpredictable angular dependence in case of cobalt nano-particles, while this material depicted the largest number of steps in general. Comparing the angular dependence of the coercive fields with previous calculations, it was shown that usual descriptions of fourfold anisotropies are no longer valid in most of the nano-objects under examination.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences 1 Faculty of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, , 33609 Bielefeld, Germany
Silesian University of Technology 2 Institute of Physics – Center for Science and Education, , 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2001 · 294 · 148810.1126/science.1065389 ↗
2. Journal of Physics D · 2002 · 35 · R15710.1088/0022-3727/35/19/201 ↗
3. Nature Materials · 2007 · 6 · 81310.1038/nmat2024 ↗
4. Journal of Physics D · 2008 · 41 · 15300110.1088/0022-3727/41/15/153001 ↗
5. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · R363-38610.1088/0022-3727/39/20/R01 ↗
6. J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS · 2010 · 9 · 01300110.1117/1.3302125 ↗
7. Proc. SPIE Alternative Lithographic Technologies IV. · 2012 · 8323 · 83232410.1117/12.916305 ↗
8. Proc. SPIE Alternative Lithographic Technologies IV. · 2012 · 8323 · 83231410.1117/12.916315 ↗
9. Proc. SPIE Alternative Lithographic Technologies IV. · 2012 · 8323 · 83232810.1117/12.916353 ↗
10. Science · 2000 · 287 · 198910.1126/science.287.5460.1989 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 691410.1063/1.1452189 ↗
12. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2003 · 260 · 15110.1016/S0304-8853(02)01315-X ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2014 · 89 · 180405(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.89.180405 ↗
14. J. Mater. Chem C · 2015 · 3 · 469910.1039/C4TC02988G ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 07391110.1063/1.3646490 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 01390110.1063/1.4772459 ↗
17. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2009 · 45 · 532610.1109/TMAG.2009.2026573 ↗
18. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 293210.1016/j.jmmm.2009.04.046 ↗
19. AIP Advances · 2014 · 4 · 08711510.1063/1.4892955 ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 344310.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 65 · 436210.1063/1.343273 ↗
22. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1991 · 27 · 358810.1109/20.102931 ↗
23. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 33500110.1088/0022-3727/47/33/335001 ↗
24. Journal of Applied Physics · 2015 · 117 · 17390310.1063/1.4919839 ↗
25. J. Magn. Magn. Mat. · 2013 · 331 · 2110.1016/j.jmmm.2012.11.014 ↗