journal article·2024-06-01Open access

Normal and diabetic foot sole skin mimicking tissue phantom fulfillment for spectroscopic-based DFU diagnostics perspective

Ajay Kumar, Gangadhar Hattale, Sarika Hinge, Gauri Kulkarni, Dattatray J. Late, Rajesh Kanawade

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

The development and advancement of spectroscopy techniques for the timely diagnosis of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) requires foot-skin equivalent reference objects, such as tissue phantoms. Therefore, herein, we describe the fabrication and characterization of a solid and single-layered tissue-mimicking phantom, which mimics the optical properties of the sole skin of the normal and diabetic foot. We found that 600 µl of 7% w/v titanium dioxide (TiO2) per 100 ml epoxy solution could provide a solid tissue phantom with the optical properties equivalent to those of a healthy foot. On the contrary, adding 10 µl of India ink to the same phantom concentration could provide a phantom with optical properties equivalent to those of diabetic foot sole skin. Monte Carlo simulations have been performed based on the calculated optical properties and geometry of the developed phantom and found that the fluence distribution was higher in the normal foot compared to the diabetic foot. To investigate the feasibility of the developed phantoms in spectroscopy study, diffuse reflectance measurements have been performed. The diffuse reflectance of the normal phantom plate was higher than that of the diabetic phantom plate. Furthermore, phantom inhomogeneity error was measured and found to be less than 2%, indicating that nearly homogeneous phantoms have been developed. The stability study confirmed that the optical properties of the developed phantoms do not change significantly after a six-month period, which potentially makes them a suitable controlled reference object that may be used in spectroscopy studies for DFU diagnosis and assessment of its severity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physical and Materials Chemistry Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory 1 , Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411008, India

Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR) 2 , Ghaziabad 201002, India

Department of Physics, Fergusson College (Autonomous) 3 , Shivajinagar, Pune 411004, India

Department of Physics, Savitribai Phule Pune University 4 , Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India

Materials Science and Technology Research Group, Brane Enterprises Private Limited 5 , Hyderabad 500081, India

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. · 2010 · 45 · 110.1080/05704920903435375 ↗
2. Biopolymers · 2002 · 67 · 110.1002/bip.10064 ↗
3. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. · 2018 · 26 · 33710.1177/0967033518806637 ↗
4. Prog. Biomed. Eng. · 2020 · 2 · 04200110.1088/2516-1091/abaaa3 ↗
5. Physiol. Meas. · 2002 · 23 · 74110.1088/0967-3334/23/4/312 ↗
6. J. Biomed. Opt. · 2006 · 11 · 04110210.1117/1.2335429 ↗
7. J. Biomed. Opt. · 2006 · 11 · 04110310.1117/1.2240972 ↗
8. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 01531510.1063/1.5016679 ↗
9. AIP Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 08530110.1063/5.0055949 ↗
10. Biomed. Opt. Express · 2019 · 10 · 209010.1364/boe.10.002090 ↗
11. J. Biomed. Opt. · 2013 · 18 · 2500610.1117/1.JBO.18.2.025006 ↗
12. Proc. SPIE · 2013 · 8583 · 85830G10.1117/12.2003603 ↗
13. Proc. SPIE · 2019 · 11074 · 110742W10.1117/12.2526969 ↗
14. Opt. Lett. · 2014 · 39 · 301010.1364/ol.39.003010 ↗
15. Proc. SPIE · 2010 · 7567 · 75670D10.1117/12.843609 ↗
16. Biomed. Opt. Express · 2014 · 5 · 314010.1364/boe.5.003140 ↗
17. Ultrasound Med. Biol. · 2018 · 44 · 281310.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.08.012 ↗
18. Phys. Med. Biol. · 2021 · 66 · 24501110.1088/1361-6560/ac3d18 ↗
19. Heliyon · 2020 · 6 · e0360210.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03602 ↗
20. Medicine · 2018 · 97 · e1376510.1097/md.0000000000013765 ↗
21. Biomed. Opt. Express · 2021 · 12 · 95510.1364/boe.402081 ↗
22. Proc. SPIE · 2011 · 7898 · 78980Z10.1117/12.881604 ↗
23. J. Nucl. Med. · 2016 · 57 · 199810.2967/jnumed.116.178046 ↗
24. J. Biomed. Opt. · 2021 · 27 · 07470710.1117/1.jbo.27.7.074707 ↗
25. J. Innovative Opt. Health Sci. · 2015 · 08 · 154100510.1142/s1793545815410059 ↗
26. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. · 2022 · 17 · 17710.1007/s11548-021-02406-0 ↗
27. PLoS One · 2013 · 8 · e6418010.1371/journal.pone.0064180 ↗
28. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2023 · 33 · 221488510.1002/adfm.202214885 ↗
29. Ann. Med. · 2017 · 49 · 10610.1080/07853890.2016.1231932 ↗
30. Diabetes, Metab. Syndr. Obes.: Targets Ther. · 2020 · 13 · 183510.2147/dmso.s256243 ↗
31. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. · 2006 · 53 · 104710.1109/tbme.2006.873541 ↗
32. Front. Phys. · 2022 · 10 · 85381310.3389/fphy.2022.853813 ↗
33. Opt. Lasers Eng. · 2014 · 53 · 110.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.020 ↗
34. Proc. SPIE · 2021 · 11651 · 116510T10.1117/12.2583022 ↗
35. 2008
36. C. Mätzler , MATLAB Functions for Mie Scattering and Absorption, Institute of Applied Physics, University of Bern, Switzerland, 2002.
37. Proc. SPIE · 2022 · 11934 · 119340L10.1117/12.2609577 ↗
38. 1995
39. Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed. · 1995 · 47 · 13110.1016/0169-2607(95)01640-f ↗
40. J. Biomed. Opt. · 2008 · 13 · 04400510.1117/1.2960952 ↗
41. Phys. Med. Biol. · 1999 · 44 · 96710.1088/0031-9155/44/4/012 ↗