An improved stress-dependent magnetostriction model of silicon steel based on simplified multi-scale and Jiles–Atherton theory
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the magnetic domain movement and energy change under magnetic field and stress applied, the macroscopic magnetic properties and magnetostriction properties of non-oriented (NO) silicon steel are influenced. To present this effect of the magnetic domains’ motion mechanism, a stress-dependent magnetostriction must be modeled. This paper proposes an improved stress-dependent magnetostriction model (I-SDM model) for NO silicon steel based on a simplified multi-scale model. Firstly, the stress-dependent expression of the anhysteretic magnetization, obtained by assuming a six-domain structure and considering the volume fraction of magnetic domain energy, is introduced into the inverse Jiles–Atherton (JA) model. In this way, the stress-dependent hysteresis model is constructed. Then, coupling with the improved quadratic domain rotation model that considers pinning effects, the I-SDM model for NO silicon steel is built. Finally, with the parameters obtained from experimental results, the proposed model under varying stresses is simulated and compared with other models. It shows that the proposed model has the highest simulated accuracy for both λ-H loop and λ-B loop with stress applied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Electrical Engineering and New Energy, China Three Gorges University 1 , Yichang 443002, China
State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology 2 , Tianjin 300130, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 37410.1109/tmag.2010.2095875 ↗
2. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2012 · 324 · 195410.1016/j.jmmm.2012.01.028 ↗
3. Journal of Applied Physics · 1987 · 61 · 379910.1063/1.338650 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2016 · 52 · 259038410.1109/TMAG.2016.2590384 ↗
5. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · 2008 · 56 · 101810.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.003 ↗
6. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica · 2015 · 28 · 5010.1016/s0894-9166(15)60015-5 ↗
7. AIP Advances · 2021 · 11 · 01512010.1063/9.0000026 ↗
8. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 83 · 3090410.1051/epjap/2018180079 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 36910.1109/tmag.2013.2284381 ↗
10. Physica B: Condensed Matter · 2011 · 406 · 275510.1016/j.physb.2011.04.021 ↗
11. Journal of Applied Physics · 1988 · 63 · 393010.1063/1.340609 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2019 · 55 · 18409709
13. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2020 · 56 · 7511405
14. AIP Advances · 2021 · 11 · 01502210.1063/9.0000030 ↗