journal article·2024-12-01Open access

The linear electromagnetic gyrokinetic global simulation by using the numerical Lie-transform code

Guodong Zhang, Jinxiang You, Zihao Wang, Tiannan Wu, Yuefeng Qiu, Lu Wang, Shaojie Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 12

Abstract

Electromagnetic gyrokinetic simulation plays an important role in the research of anomalous transport driven by micro-turbulence in tokamak fusion plasmas. The development of electromagnetic gyrokinetic codes usually faces challenges including physical model, numerical instabilities as well as corresponding algorithms and accuracy; one of the typical challenges is the well-known cancellation problem. In this work, the gyrokinetic code NLT [Ye et al., J. Comput. Phys. 316, 180 (2016)] is updated to the electromagnetic version. The scheme of mitigating the cancellation problem in GYRO [Candy and Waltz, J. Comput. Phys. 186, 545 (2003)] is adopted. The simulation results including the real frequency, linear growth rate, and mode structures of the ion temperature gradient mode and the trapped electron mode as well as the kinetic ballooning mode from NLT are consistent with those from previous Eulerian and particle in cell codes. Moreover, it is found that the cancellation problem does not exist, at least for the drift waves, in the NLT simulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Technology, International Joint Research Laboratory of Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Plasma Physics, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology 1 , Wuhan 430074,

Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China 2 , Hefei 230023,

Funding

National MCF Energy R&D program of China · The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Fluids B · 1990 · 2 · 287910.1063/1.859358 ↗
2. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2004 · 46 · B55710.1088/0741-3335/46/12b/045 ↗
3. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2007 · 79 · 42110.1103/revmodphys.79.421 ↗
4. D. H. E. Dubin , J. A.Krommes, C.Oberman, and W. W.Lee, Technical Report No. PPPL-1969, 010846, 1983.
5. Phys. Fluids · 1988 · 31 · 194010.1063/1.866641 ↗
6. J. Plasma Phys. · 1989 · 41 · 54110.1017/s0022377800014070 ↗
7. Phys. Rep. · 1981 · 79 · 12910.1016/0370-1573(81)90175-7 ↗
8. Phys. Fluids · 1981 · 24 · 123810.1063/1.863527 ↗
9. J. Math. Phys. · 1982 · 23 · 74210.1063/1.525429 ↗
10. J. Comput. Phys. · 1987 · 72 · 24310.1016/0021-9991(87)90080-5 ↗
11. Nucl. Fusion · 2010 · 50 · 04300210.1088/0029-5515/50/4/043002 ↗
12. Science · 1998 · 181 · 183510.1126/science.281.5384.1835 ↗
13. J. Comput. Phys. · 2003 · 186 · 54510.1016/s0021-9991(03)00079-2 ↗
14. J. Comput. Phys. · 2006 · 217 · 39510.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.023 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 7110.1103/physrevlett.77.71 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 71 · 204210.1103/physrevlett.71.2042 ↗
17. J. C. Cumming , Ph.D. thesis, Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University, 1995.
18. Phys. Plasmas · 2001 · 8 · 209510.1063/1.1351828 ↗
19. Phys. Plasmas · 2004 · 11 · 548010.1063/1.1812275 ↗
20. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2019 · 238 · 19410.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.002 ↗
21. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 10251610.1063/1.4995455 ↗
22. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 02251510.1063/1.5016432 ↗
23. J. Comput. Phys. · 2011 · 230 · 705310.1016/j.jcp.2011.05.034 ↗
24. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2013 · 184 · 246210.1016/j.cpc.2013.06.014 ↗
25. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 265010.1016/j.cpc.2009.07.001 ↗
26. J. Comput. Phys. · 2003 · 189 · 46310.1016/s0021-9991(03)00228-6 ↗
27. Phys. Plasmas · 2021 · 28 · 03450110.1063/5.0030937 ↗
28. Phys. Plasmas · 2021 · 28 · 07250510.1063/5.0047842 ↗
29. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 2310.1063/1.4954915 ↗
30. J. Comput. Phys. · 2016 · 316 · 18010.1016/j.jcp.2016.03.068 ↗
31. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 08251510.1063/1.4986395 ↗
32. Phys. Plasmas · 2012 · 19 · 06250410.1063/1.4729660 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. E. · 2013 · 87 · 06310310.1103/PhysRevE.87.063103 ↗
34. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 08231210.1063/1.4818593 ↗
35. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 04250510.1063/1.4871726 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2024 · 132 · 06510610.1103/physrevlett.132.065106 ↗
37. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2021 · 269 · 10811410.1016/j.cpc.2021.108114 ↗
38. Phys. Fluids · 1983 · 26 · 55610.1063/1.864140 ↗
39. Phys. Fluids · 1981 · 24 · 199910.1063/1.863297 ↗
40. Phys. Plasmas · 1995 · 2 · 268710.1063/1.871232 ↗
41. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2019 · 242 · 7210.1016/j.cpc.2019.04.004 ↗
42. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 20 · 07400810.1088/2058-6272/aac013 ↗
43. AIP Adv. · 2023 · 13 · 09511410.1063/5.0156382 ↗
44. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2007 · 49 · B17310.1088/0741-3335/49/12b/s16 ↗
45. J. Comput. Phys. · 2015 · 283 · 51810.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.017 ↗
46. 2024
47. 1996
48. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 02230810.1063/1.4976120 ↗
49. Phys. Plasmas · 2015 · 22 · 06230310.1063/1.4922659 ↗
50. Phys. Plasmas · 2019 · 26 · 08230110.1063/1.5100308 ↗
51. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 03230910.1063/1.4798392 ↗
52. Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 10231010.1063/1.3005380 ↗
53. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 11231410.1063/1.3495976 ↗
54. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2000 · 125 · 19610.1016/s0010-4655(99)00489-0 ↗
55. Phys. Plasmas · 1994 · 1 · 82210.1063/1.870740 ↗
56. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2003 · 154 · 9810.1016/s0010-4655(03)00288-1 ↗
57. J. Comput. Phys. · 2007 · 225 · 56810.1016/j.jcp.2006.12.019 ↗
58. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 05211310.1063/1.4895501 ↗