journal article·2024-12-01Open access

Excavation deformation analysis of subway foundation pits based on finite element analysis

Yingchao Li, Zhao Liu

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 12

Abstract

The excavation deformation of subway foundation pit engineering is limited by the engineering characteristics. There is a risk of collapse lag and incalculable consequences. To improve the safety factor in subway foundation pit construction and prevent the risk of foundation pit collapse, finite element analysis was utilized to simulate the deformation of subway foundation pit excavation. Meanwhile, a risk assessment method for the collapse of foundation pit support was constructed by combining the fuzzy hierarchical comprehensive evaluation model in the experiment. Numerical analysis confirmed that the maximum horizontal displacement of the foundation pit when excavated to the bottom was 11.96 mm, and the maximum surface settlement was 11.50 mm. These simulation results were highly consistent with the measured curve, with a maximum displacement difference of only 2.87 mm and a maximum settlement difference of 2.00 mm. According to the proposed method, foundation pit engineering’s evaluation was carried out, with a support structure score of 0.437, a surrounding soil score of 0.450, a bottom soil score of 0.267, and an overall project risk score of 0.416, all within an acceptable range. Therefore, the method of simulating and predicting excavation deformation of subway foundation pits using the finite element software is effective and reliable. According to the risk assessment results of foundation pit collapse, relevant management personnel should strengthen and attach importance to the prevention of collapse of the surrounding soil and support structures of the foundation pit.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Transportation Engineering, Huanghe Jiaotong University , Jiaozuo 454950,

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Multimodal urban transportation system for medium size cities10.1007/s40030-023-00763-4 ↗
2. The implementation of smart mobility for smart cities: A case study in Qatar10.28991/cej-2022-08-10-09 ↗
3. Research on the impact of underground excavation metro on surface traffic safety and assessment method10.1080/02533839.2023.2170928 ↗
4. Development of urban underground space in coastal cities in China: A review10.1002/dug2.12034 ↗
5. Deformation law and spatial effect of deep foundation pits for subway construction in soil-rock composite strata in seasonally frozen areas10.17559/TV-20230208000333 ↗
6. Construction technology of deep foundation pit around existing subway project10.23977/jceup.2023.050806 ↗
7. Analysis of the influence of super large area and super deep foundation pit excavation construction on surrounding subways10.21595/jmai.2022.22776 ↗
8. Comparison of shallow tunneling method with pile and rib method for construction of subway station in soft ground10.1007/s11709-021-0746-4 ↗
9. A critical historic overview of artificial intelligence: Issues, challenges, opportunities, and threats10.47852/bonviewaia3202689 ↗
10. Application of finite element analysis to honeycomb sandwich structures: A review10.31181/rme20023032022o ↗
11. Assessment of process, parameters, residual stress mitigation, post treatments and finite element analysis simulations of wire arc additive manufacturing technique10.1007/s12540-021-01015-5 ↗
12. Effects on spoke structure of non-pneumatic tires by finite element analysis10.1007/s12239-022-0126-7 ↗
13. 3D FEM model on the parameters’ influence of EPB-TBM on settlements of single and twin metro tunnels during construction10.1007/s42947-021-00034-0 ↗
14. Evolution model and quantitative assessment of risk network in housing construction accidents10.1108/ecam-05-2022-0446 ↗
15. A modified risk matrix method for behavioral risk evaluation in the construction industry10.1080/13467581.2021.1905647 ↗
16. Does intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process work better than analytic hierarchy process?10.1007/s40815-021-01163-1 ↗
17. Multi-criteria decision making for determining best teaching method using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process10.1007/s00500-022-07554-2 ↗
18. What drives clients to purchase green building? The cybernetic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach10.1108/ecam-11-2020-0945 ↗