journal article·2023-09-01Open access

Gyrokinetic simulations of ion temperature gradient instability in deuterium–tritium plasma in the CFETR hybrid scenario

Ruzhi Tang, Debing Zhang, Xianmei Zhang, Limin Yu, Lianjie Ma, Shuyu Zheng, Lei Ye, Yingfeng Xu, Pengfei Zhao

AIP Advances· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

The linear instabilities and nonlinear transport driven by the ion temperature gradient (ITG) instability are numerically investigated in deuterium–tritium plasma in the CFETR hybrid scenario by using the NLT code. In both linear and nonlinear simulations, effects of the tritium fraction ɛT and the temperature ratio of deuterium and tritium τDT = TD/TT are studied, with TD and TT being the temperature of deuterium and tritium, respectively. Results from linear simulations illustrate that the ITG instability can be well stabilized as ɛT increases. When ɛT = 0.5, the maximum growth rate occurs at around τDT = 1.5. During the nonlinear simulations, the anomalous particle and energy flux in deuterium–tritium plasma are analyzed. For τDT = 1.0, it is found that the tritium (deuterium) particle flux is inward (outward) and the largest inward tritium particle flux appears at ɛT = 0.5. The total ion energy flux is found to be insensitive to ɛT. In the case with ɛT = 0.5, as τDT decreases from 3.0 to 0.5, the particle flux for tritium (deuterium) changes from the outward (inward) direction to the inward (outward) direction. The quasilinear analysis clarifies that the particle flux driven by the temperature gradient is the key part in determining the direction of the particle flux. Besides, the largest and the smallest energy flux appear at around τDT = 1.5 and 0.5, respectively. It is indicated that better energy confinement and better particle confinement for tritium could be realized by choosing smaller τDT (or higher TT).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, East China University of Science and Technology 1 , Shanghai 200237, China

Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Hefei 230031, China

College of Science, Donghua University 3 , Shanghai 201620, China

Funding

National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program of China · Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2014 · 42 · 49510.1109/tps.2013.2296939 ↗
2. Nucl. Fusion · 2017 · 57 · 10200910.1088/1741-4326/aa686a ↗
3. ITER Physics Basis Editors · Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 213710.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301 ↗
4. ITER Physics Expert Groups on Confinement and Transport and Confinement Modelling and Database · Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 217510.1088/0029-5515/39/12/302 ↗
5. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2017 · 59 · 07500510.1088/1361-6587/aa6d20 ↗
6. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 04600210.1088/1741-4326/abd7b8 ↗
7. Nucl. Fusion · 2015 · 55 · 09300210.1088/0029-5515/55/9/093002 ↗
8. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 11201010.1088/1741-4326/ab0e27 ↗
9. Phys. Fluids B · 1989 · 1 · 101810.1063/1.859023 ↗
10. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1999 · 71 · 73510.1103/revmodphys.71.735 ↗
11. Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 08230510.1063/1.2755981 ↗
12. Phys. Plasmas · 2005 · 12 · 07230910.1063/1.1947447 ↗
13. J. Fusion Energy · 2021 · 40 · 810.1007/s10894-021-00303-7 ↗
14. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 01602010.1088/1741-4326/abc080 ↗
15. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 05590210.1063/1.5016331 ↗
16. Phys. Plasmas · 2019 · 26 · 08230510.1063/1.5110401 ↗
17. Phys. Plasmas · 2021 · 28 · 06230110.1063/5.0048620 ↗
18. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 09230510.1088/1742-6596/775/1/012014 ↗
19. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 12602510.1088/1741-4326/ab3ecc ↗
20. Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 113310.1088/0029-5515/39/9/307 ↗
21. Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 20910.1088/0029-5515/39/2/306 ↗
22. J. Plasma Phys. · 2020 · 86 · 90586050110.1017/s0022377820000781 ↗
23. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 09603010.1088/1741-4326/aba452 ↗
24. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2022 · 64 · 05400110.1088/1361-6587/ac53ef ↗
25. Phys. Plasmas · 2012 · 19 · 06250410.1063/1.4729660 ↗
26. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 08231210.1063/1.4818593 ↗
27. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 07231210.1088/1674-1056/ab5437 ↗
28. Commun. Comput. Phys. · 2017 · 22 · 78910.4208/cicp.oa-2016-0092 ↗
29. J. Comput. Phys. · 2016 · 316 · 18010.1016/j.jcp.2016.03.068 ↗
30. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 08251510.1063/1.4986395 ↗
31. Nucl. Fusion · 2022 · 62 · 12606410.1088/1741-4326/ac97f3 ↗
32. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2022 · 64 · 05500810.1088/1361-6587/ac5a0d ↗
33. Nucl. Fusion · 2015 · 55 · 02300510.1088/0029-5515/55/2/023005 ↗
34. Nucl. Fusion · 1994 · 34 · 112110.1088/0029-5515/34/8/i06 ↗
35. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 03600410.1088/1741-4326/ab6307 ↗
36. Phys. Fluids B · 1990 · 2 · 75410.1063/1.859313 ↗
37. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 24 · 02510410.1088/2058-6272/ac42bc ↗
38. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 07250910.1063/1.4959812 ↗
39. Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 11400310.1088/0029-5515/52/11/114003 ↗
40. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1989 · 29 · 25110.1088/0029-5515/29/2/008 ↗
41. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2001 · 43 · 15510.1088/0741-3335/43/2/306 ↗
42. Phys. Plasmas · 2021 · 28 · 05230110.1063/5.0045104 ↗
43. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2007 · 49 · B16310.1088/0741-3335/49/12b/s15 ↗
44. Phys. Plasmas · 2019 · 26 · 05250410.1063/1.5087203 ↗