Bi-exponential decay model of electron in Al2O3/Au NCs/Al2O3 structure
Source abstract
Abstract
As state-of-the-art electronic chips were miniaturized to its limit, many small dimension issues, such as crosstalk noise, parasite capacitance, and tunneling of charges, emerged. Studying such issues shall be of interest to the research and industry field. Here, we studied the electrical behavior of electrons injected in an array of nanostructures embedded on Al2O3 dielectrics. Our multi-stack device comprised Au nanoclusters, tunneling and blocking Al2O3 oxide layers, and a Si substrate. The electrons were injected by applying a bias at the top of the atomic force microscopy tip in contact while grounding the Si substrate. Its retention and diffusion behaviors were observed by measuring the contact potential difference (CPD). The measured CPD data with time were well fitted to the bi-exponential function, which had two time constants τ1 and τ2. It indicated that at least two dominant tunneling mechanisms existed, so it was confirmed with I–V measurement using a simple tunneling device (Pt/Al2O3/Si structure). This work may provide a tool for analysis of charge transportation in a miniaturized nanostructure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Institute of Basic Science, Inha University 1 , Incheon 22212, Korea
Department of Physics, Inha University 2 , Incheon 22212, Korea
Department of Nano and Microsystems, Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona (IMB-CNM, CSIC) 3 , Bellaterra 08193, Spain
Funding
Inha University
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2014 · 9 · 52610.1186/1556-276x-9-526 ↗
2. InfoMat · 2020 · 2 · 26110.1002/inf2.12077 ↗
3. Gold Bull · 2010 · 43 · 18910.1007/bf03214986 ↗
4. Materials · 2014 · 7 · 511710.3390/ma7075117 ↗
5. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2021 · 16 · 88210.1038/s41565-021-00904-5 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. · 2015 · 15 · 13610.1109/tdmr.2015.2398193 ↗
7. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1350410.1038/srep13504 ↗
8. Nanoscale Adv. · 2020 · 2 · 181110.1039/d0na00100g ↗
9. Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2020 · 14 · 190059610.1002/pssr.201900596 ↗
10. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2018 · 2014 · 1810.1155/2014/578168 ↗
11. Nano Sel. · 2021 · 2 · 124510.1002/nano.202000268 ↗
12. Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 341010.1039/c3nr05675a ↗
13. Materials · 2022 · 15 · 77410.3390/ma15030774 ↗
14. Cryst. Growth Des. · 2010 · 10 · 58710.1021/cg900981q ↗
15. Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 212610.1038/srep02126 ↗
16. Sci. Adv. · 2016 · 2 · e150110110.1126/sciadv.1501101 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 132610.1063/1.124682 ↗
18. Nanotechnology · 2016 · 27 · 24570210.1088/0957-4484/27/24/245702 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 02310710.1063/1.3610486 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 20290110.1063/5.0001770 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 790010.1063/1.365364 ↗
22. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 08530210.1063/1.5116204 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 05410610.1063/1.3309763 ↗
24. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2013 · 34 · 87010.1109/led.2013.2260853 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 1963 · 34 · 179310.1063/1.1702682 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 02680110.1103/physrevlett.97.026801 ↗