journal article·2020-06-01Open access

Multi-level resistance uniformity of double pinned perpendicular magnetic-tunnel-junction spin-valve depending on top MgO barrier thickness

Han-Sol Jun, Jin-Young Choi, Kei Ashiba, Sun-Hwa Jung, Miri Park, Jong-Ung Baek, Tae-Hun Shim, Jea-Gun Park

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 6

Abstract

In order to utilize perpendicular spin-torque-transfer magnetic-random-access-memory (p-STT MRAM) as a storage class memory, the achievement of performing multi-level-cell (MLC) operation is important in increasing the integration density of p-STT MRAM. For a double pinned perpendicular magnetic tunneling junction spin-valve performing MLC (i.e., four-resistance level) operation, the uniformity in the resistance difference between four-level resistances was investigated theoretically and experimentally. The uniformity in the resistance difference between four-level resistances was strongly dependent on the top MgO tunneling-barrier thickness. Particularly, the most uniform resistance difference between four resistance states could be achieved at a critical top-MgO tunneling thickness (i.e., ∼1.15 nm).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

MRAM Center, Department of Nanoscale Semiconductor Engineering, Hanyang University 1 , Seoul 04763, South Korea

MRAM Center, Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Hanyang University 2 , Seoul 04763, South Korea

Wafer Engineering Department, SUMCO Corporation 3 , 1-52 Kubara, Imari, Saga 849-4256, Japan

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17261510.1063/1.4870917 ↗
2. IEEE Access · 2019 · 7 · 5808510.1109/access.2019.2906942 ↗
3. MTJ-based nonvolatile logic-in-memory circuit, future prospects and issues
4. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 72110.1038/nmat2804 ↗
5. 2015 · 19.2.1
6. 2010 · 51
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 24250210.1063/1.3049617 ↗
8. 2010 · 47
9. 2012 · 526
10. ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. · 2013 · 9 · 110.1145/2463585.2463589 ↗
11. 2008 · 1
12. 2011 · 531
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 13240810.1063/1.3694270 ↗
14. Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 814210.1039/c5nr01140j ↗
15. Nanotechnology · 2015 · 26 · 19570210.1088/0957-4484/26/19/195702 ↗
16. 2015 · 26.1.1
17. Nanotechnology · 2016 · 27 · 48520310.1088/0957-4484/27/48/485203 ↗
18. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 · 2005 · 44 · L58710.1143/jjap.44.l587 ↗
19. Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2016 · 11 · 43310.1186/s11671-016-1637-9 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 24250110.1063/1.3273397 ↗
21. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 690210.1038/s41598-018-25255-5 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 02250510.1063/1.3460910 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 80 · 312110.1063/1.363124 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 18240610.1063/1.4919873 ↗
25. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 05612310.1063/1.4944520 ↗
26. Nanotechnology · 2015 · 26 · 47570510.1088/0957-4484/26/47/475705 ↗
27. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · R33710.1088/0022-3727/40/21/r01 ↗
28. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2015 · 4 · 13510.1039/C5TC03669K ↗
29. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 13960110.1088/0022-3727/46/13/139601 ↗
30. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2009 · 45 · 346410.1109/tmag.2009.2025382 ↗
31. Nanotechnology · 2016 · 27 · 29570510.1088/0957-4484/27/29/295705 ↗
32. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 1190710.1038/s41598-017-10967-x ↗
33. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 10310.1109/tmag.2005.861786 ↗
34. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 15390110.1063/1.4918307 ↗
35. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 18240510.1063/1.4967172 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 05440110.1103/physrevb.84.054401 ↗
37. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3812510.1038/srep38125 ↗