Spin–transfer torque oscillator in magnetic tunneling junction with short–wavelength magnon excitation
Source abstract
Abstract
Bloch–Bloembergen–Slonczewski (BBS) equation is established by extending Bloch–Bloembergen equation, and it is used to study magnetization oscillation in the free magnetic layer of a magnetic tunneling junction. Since both short–wavelength magnon excitation and spin–transfer torque are taken into account in the BBS equation, it is distinguished from Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert–Slonczewski equation. The macro–spin BBS model predicts that the transverse relaxation time in free magnetic layer should be long enough, as compared with the longitudinal relaxation time, to achieve stable magnetization oscillation for spin–transfer torque oscillator application. Moreover, field–like torque favors the tolerance of fast transverse relaxation, which makes magnetic tunneling junction a better choice than spin valve for the spin–transfer torque oscillator application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Science, Taiyuan Institute of Technology 1 , Taiyuan 030008, China
School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University 2 , Jinan 250100, China
College of Physics, Qingdao University 3 , Qingdao 266071, China
Funding
Program for the Innovative Talents of Taiyuan Institute of Technology · the National 111 Project of China's Higher Education · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 611510.1021/nn301222v ↗
2. Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 221910.1039/c2nr33407k ↗
3. Science · 2005 · 307 · 22810.1126/science.1105722 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 17250810.1063/1.2732816 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 10392110.1063/1.3260233 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 23211910.1063/1.3272268 ↗
7. AIP. Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 05711410.1063/1.4920941 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Magnet. · 1998 · 34 · 183410.1109/20.706720 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 06241510.1063/1.4792269 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 02240310.1063/1.3675614 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 15240510.1063/1.4759039 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 739510.1103/physrevb.60.7395 ↗
13. AIP. Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 05521210.1063/1.4950971 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 16720310.1103/physrevlett.90.167203 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 38 · 1144410.1103/physrevb.38.11444 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 05441410.1103/physrevb.86.054414 ↗
17. 1964
18. Phys. Stat. Solidi B · 2008 · 245 · 17410.1002/pssb.200776452 ↗
19. AIP. Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 05612510.1063/1.4944768 ↗
20. Nature · 2010 · 464 · 26210.1038/nature08876 ↗
21. Nat. Phys. · 2015 · 11 · 45310.1038/nphys3347 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. · 1950 · 78 · 57210.1103/physrev.78.572 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 01440410.1103/physrevb.88.014404 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 22040710.1103/physrevb.67.220407 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 97 · 02442410.1103/physrevb.97.024424 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 05760110.1103/physrevlett.116.057601 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 24660210.1103/physrevlett.100.246602 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 17250110.1063/1.3499755 ↗
29. AIP. Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 05581610.1063/1.4943764 ↗
30. Can. J. Phys. · 1970 · 48 · 290610.1139/p70-361 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 14442410.1103/physrevb.73.144424 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 10720410.1103/physrevlett.107.107204 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 18041110.1103/physrevb.71.180411 ↗
34. Nat. Phys. · 2008 · 4 · 80310.1038/nphys1036 ↗
35. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 548610.1038/srep05486 ↗
36. Appl. Phys. Express · 2014 · 7 · 04300110.7567/apex.7.043001 ↗
37. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 18442610.1103/physrevb.79.184426 ↗
38. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 96 · 157210.1063/1.1763996 ↗