journal article·2023-08-01Open access

Probabilistic deep learning of turbulent premixed combustion

Junsu Shin, Victor Xing, Michael Pfitzner, Corentin Lapeyre

AIP Advances· Volume 13· Issue 8

Abstract

A probabilistic data-driven approach that models the filtered reaction rate in large-eddy simulation (LES) is investigated. We propose a novel framework that incorporates a conditional generative adversarial network and a Gaussian mixture model to take into account the statistical fluctuations that are present in LES of turbulent reacting flows due to non-resolved subgrid structures, which cannot be predicted by purely deterministic models and machine learning algorithms. The data from a direct numerical simulation of turbulent premixed combustion are spatially filtered using a wide range of filter widths and employed for the training. We extract physically relevant parameters from the database and reduce the input features to the network to the most influential ones based on the result of feature importance analysis. The trained model is then tested on unseen timesteps and untrained LES filter widths, where it is able to accurately predict the distribution of the filtered reaction rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Combustion and flame dynamics · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Wind and Air Flow Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bundeswehr University Munich 1 , Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany

CERFACS 2 , 42 avenue Gaspard Coriolis, Toulouse 31057, France

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · NextGenerationEU

References (98)

Show source-provided references
1. Structures of turbulent premixed flames in the high Karlovitz number regime – DNS analysis10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.046 ↗
2. Turbulent premixed combustion: Flamelet structure and its effect on turbulent burning velocities10.1016/j.pecs.2007.04.002 ↗
3. On the statistics of flame stretch in turbulent premixed jet flames in the thin reaction zone regime at varying Reynolds number10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.194 ↗
4. A filtered tabulated chemistry model for LES of premixed combustion10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.09.015 ↗
5. A multidimensional combustion model for oblique, wrinkled premixed flames10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112121 ↗
6. Synergistic interactions of thermodiffusive instabilities and turbulence in lean hydrogen flames10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112254 ↗
7. Data-driven subfilter modelling of thermo-diffusively unstable hydrogen–air premixed flames10.1080/13647830.2021.1925350 ↗
8. A two-equation model for non-unity Lewis number differential diffusion in lean premixed laminar flames10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.10.004 ↗
10. A consistent LES/filtered-density function formulation for the simulation of turbulent flames with detailed chemistry10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.152 ↗
11. Filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows10.1063/1.869537 ↗
12. Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.003 ↗
13. Gaussian mixture model for extreme wind turbulence estimation10.5194/wes-7-2135-2022 ↗
14. Modelling synthetic atmospheric turbulence profiles with temporal variation using Gaussian mixture model10.1093/mnras/sty1951 ↗
15. Size-and-shape space Gaussian mixture models for structural clustering of molecular dynamics trajectories10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01290 ↗
16. Gaussian mixture models for diatomic gas−surface interactions under thermal non-equilibrium conditions10.1063/5.0099863 ↗
17. An approximate inertial manifold (AIM) based closure for turbulent flows10.1063/5.0097981 ↗
18. Estimating uncertainty in homogeneous turbulence evolution due to coarse-graining10.1063/1.5080460 ↗
19. Systematic analysis strategies for the development of combustion models from DNS: A review10.1007/s10494-015-9645-x ↗
20. Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence10.1017/S0022112099006369 ↗
21. Deep learning-based model for progress variable dissipation rate in turbulent premixed flames10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.205 ↗
22. Modeling of sub-grid conditional mixing statistics in turbulent sprays using machine learning methods10.1063/5.0027524 ↗
23. Deep learning for presumed probability density function models10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.07.015 ↗
24. Application of machine learning for filtered density function closure in MILD combustion10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.10.043 ↗
25. Training convolutional neural networks to estimate turbulent sub-grid scale reaction rates10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.02.019 ↗
26. A data-driven subgrid scale model in large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111486 ↗
27. A priori assessment of convolutional neural network and algebraic models for flame surface density of high Karlovitz premixed flames10.1063/5.0042732 ↗
28. Progress variable variance and filtered rate modelling using convolutional neural networks and flamelet methods10.1007/s10494-019-00028-w ↗
29. Generalization capability of convolutional neural networks for progress variable variance and reaction rate subgrid-scale modeling10.3390/en14165096 ↗
30. Direct mapping from LES resolved scales to filtered-flame generated manifolds using convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.08.014 ↗
31. Chemistry reduction using machine learning trained from non-premixed micro-mixing modeling: Application to DNS of a syngas turbulent oxy-flame with side-wall effects10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.06.008 ↗
32. A priori analysis on deep learning of filtered reaction rate10.1007/s10494-022-00330-0 ↗
33. Going deeper with convolutions
34. Deep residual learning for image recognition
35. Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos
36. Using physics-informed enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks for subfilter modeling in turbulent reactive flows10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.022 ↗
37. Combustion machine learning: Principles, progress and prospects10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101010 ↗
38. Generative adversarial nets
39. Data-driven prediction of unsteady flow over a circular cylinder using deep learning10.1017/jfm.2019.700 ↗
40. Adversarial sampling of unknown and high-dimensional conditional distributions10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110853 ↗
41. K. Fukami , R.Maulik, N.Ramachandra, K.Fukagata, and K.Taira, “Probabilistic neural network-based reduced-order surrogate for fluid flows,” arXiv:2012.08719 (2020).
42. A new analytic pdf for simulations of premixed turbulent combustion10.1007/s10494-020-00137-x ↗
43. A near-exact analytic solution of progress variable and pdf for single-step Arrhenius chemistry10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.12.007 ↗
44. An analytic probability density function for partially premixed flames with detailed chemistry10.1063/5.0038888 ↗
45. Unsteady effects of strain rate and curvature on turbulent premixed flames in an inflow–outflow configuration10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.01.007 ↗
46. Stretch rate effects on displacement speed in turbulent premixed flame kernels in the thin reaction zones regime10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.184 ↗
47. On the validity of Damköhler’s first hypothesis in turbulent Bunsen burner flames: A computational analysis10.1016/j.proci.2018.07.042 ↗
48. Direct numerical simulation of head-on quenching of statistically planar turbulent premixed methane-air flames using a detailed chemical mechanism10.1007/s10494-018-9907-5 ↗
49. 1999
50. Steady and unsteady flow simulations using the hybrid flow solver AVBP10.2514/2.636 ↗
51. Compressible large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion in complex geometry on unstructured meshes10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.03.008 ↗
52. Development of high-order Taylor–Galerkin schemes for LES10.1006/jcph.2000.6538 ↗
53. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows10.1016/0021-9991(92)90046-2 ↗
54. Diffusion by a random velocity field10.1063/1.1692799 ↗
55. Numerical simulation of compressible homogeneous flows in the turbulent regime10.1017/S0022112087002167 ↗
56. Dissipation and dilatation rates in premixed turbulent flames10.1063/5.0039101 ↗
58. On the structure and morphology of turbulent premixed flames10.1007/978-1-4684-4298-4_7 ↗
59. Response of flame thickness and propagation speed under intense turbulence in spatially developing lean premixed methane–air jet flames10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.05.019 ↗
60. Direct numerical simulations of a high Karlovitz number laboratory premixed jet flame—An analysis of flame stretch and flame thickening10.1017/jfm.2017.53 ↗
61. Flame curvature distribution in high pressure turbulent Bunsen premixed flames10.1007/s10494-018-9951-1 ↗
62. Numerical simulation of turbulent flows10.1146/annurev.fl.16.010184.000531 ↗
63. Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60464-1 ↗
64. A comparison of strategies for direct numerical simulation of turbulence chemistry interaction in generic planar turbulent premixed flames10.1007/s10494-017-9843-9 ↗
65. Unsteady strain rate and curvature effects in turbulent premixed methane-air flames10.1016/0010-2180(96)00011-9 ↗
66. Detecting novel associations in large data sets10.1126/science.1205438 ↗
67. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
68. Shapley additive explanations of multigeometrical variable coupling effect in transonic compressor10.1115/1.4053322 ↗
69. Data driven and physics constrained perturbations for turbulence model uncertainty estimation,” in AAAI 2021 Spring Symposium on Combining Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
70. A posteriori testing of algebraic flame surface density models for LES10.1080/13647830.2013.779388 ↗
71. A fractal flame-wrinkling large eddy simulation model for premixed turbulent combustion10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.068 ↗
72. Application of an evolutionary algorithm to LES modelling of turbulent transport in premixed flames10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.016 ↗
73. Mixture models: Inference and applications to clustering10.2307/2348072 ↗
74. 2006
75. M. Mirza and S.Osindero, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,” arXiv:1411.1784 (2014).
76. Probabilistic regression using conditional generative adversarial networks
77. Y. Boget , “Adversarial regression. Generative adversarial networks for non-linear regression: Theory and assessment,” arXiv:1910.09106 (2019).
78. 2020 · 1209
79. K. Aggarwal , M.Kirchmeyer, P.Yadav, S. S.Keerthi, and P.Gallinari, “Benchmarking regression methods: A comparison with CGAN,” arXiv:1905.12868 (2019).
80. N. Kodali , J.Abernethy, J.Hays, and Z.Kira, “On convergence and stability of GANs,” arXiv:1705.07215 (2017).
81. Catastrophic forgetting and mode collapse in GANs
82. Evaluation of mode collapse in generative adversarial networks
83. Improved techniques for training GANs
84. M. Arjovsky , S.Chintala, and L.Bottou, “Wasserstein GAN,” arXiv:1701.07875 (2017).
85. I. Gulrajani , F.Ahmed, M.Arjovsky, V.Dumoulin, and A.Courville, “Improved training of Wasserstein GANs,” arXiv:1704.00028 (2017).
86. X. Mao , Q.Li, H.Xie, R. Y. K.Lau, Z.Wang, and S. P.Smolley, “Least squares generative adversarial networks,” arXiv:1611.04076 (2016).10.1109/ICCV.2017.304 ↗
87. X. Zhu , Y.Liu, Z.Qin, and J.Li, “Data augmentation in emotion classification using generative adversarial networks,” arXiv:1711.00648 (2017).10.1007/978-3-319-93040-4_28 ↗
88. A reconstruction method for missing data in power system measurement based on LSGAN10.3389/fenrg.2021.651807 ↗
89. 2020 · 1
90. D. P. Kingma and J.Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic Optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
91. Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines
92. Probabilistic interpretation of feedforward classification network outputs, with relationships to statistical pattern recognition10.1007/978-3-642-76153-9_28 ↗
93. Adaptive mixtures of local experts10.1162/neco.1991.3.1.79 ↗
94. D.-A. Clevert , T.Unterthiner, and S.Hochreiter, “Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (ELUs),” arXiv:1511.07289 (2015).
95. M. Wiatrak , S. V.Albrecht, and A.Nystrom, “Stabilizing generative adversarial networks: A survey,” arXiv:1910.00927 (2019).
96. 2020
97. M. Abadi , “TensorFlow: Large-Scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems,” arXiv:1603.04467 (2016).
98. E. Trautner , “Deep neural networks for combustion modeling: Optimizing CPU-based inference for OpenFOAM,” M.S. thesis, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule, Regensburg, 2019.