journal article·2020-05-01Open access

Saturation effect of atomic magnetic resonance

Hongying Yang, Yanhua Wang, Nan Zhao

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 5

Abstract

In this paper, we experimentally study the saturation effect of rubidium atomic magnetic resonance. A pump beam is applied to create atomic spin polarization, a radio frequency (RF) magnetic field is used to drive the spin precession about a static magnetic field, and an off-resonant linearly polarized probe beam is applied to detect the spin dynamics based on the Faraday-rotation effect. When the RF magnetic field intensity becomes strong, a saturation effect is observed. We measure the resonant peak under strong RF magnetic field driving and obtain a saturation dip as an indication of the saturation effect. Furthermore, we show that the line-width of the saturation dip is much smaller than that of magnetic resonance. Accordingly, the sensitivity of the precision measurement based on the saturation dip can be significantly improved. The relations between the saturation dip in the resonant peak and the driving RF magnetic field intensity, as well as pumping intensity, are also studied in our experiment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Quantum optics and atomic interactions · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing Computational Science Research Center 1 , Beijing 100193, China

School of Physics and Electronic Enginering, Shanxi University 2 , Taiyuan 030006, China

Graduate School, China Academy of Engineering Physics 3 , Beijing 100193, China

Beijing Normal University 4 , Beijing 100875, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · NSAF Joint Fund

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 2003 · 422 · 59610.1038/nature01484 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 06300410.1103/physrevlett.95.063004 ↗
3. 2013
4. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2002 · 74 · 115310.1103/revmodphys.74.1153 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 23080110.1103/physrevlett.93.230801 ↗
6. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1972 · 44 · 16910.1103/revmodphys.44.169 ↗
7. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1997 · 69 · 62910.1103/revmodphys.69.629 ↗
8. 2010
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 13080110.1103/physrevlett.89.130801 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. · 1946 · 70 · 46010.1103/physrev.70.460 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. · 1950 · 80 · 58010.1103/physrev.80.580 ↗
12. 2008
13. Phys. Rev. · 1953 · 91 · 107110.1103/physrev.91.1071 ↗
14. 1987
15. Proc. Phys. Soc. · 1967 · 90 · 87510.1088/0370-1328/90/3/134 ↗
16. Prog. Theor. Phys. · 1958 · 19 · 54110.1143/ptp.19.541 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. · 1969 · 185 · 51710.1103/physrev.185.517 ↗
18. Nat. Phys. Sci. · 1972 · 235 · 6310.1038/physci235063a0 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1965 · 15 · 100510.1103/physrevlett.15.1005 ↗
20. Tech. Phys. · 2006 · 51 · 92410.1134/s1063784206070188 ↗
21. 2007