A construction and training data correction method for deep learning turbulence model of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes equations
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper aims at proposing a data-driven Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) calculation model based on physically constrained deep learning. Using the standard k − ɛ model as the template, part of the source terms in the ɛ equation is replaced by the deep learning model. The simulation results of this new model achieve a high error reduction of 51.7% compared to the standard k − ɛ model. To improve the generality, the accuracy, and the convergence for the undeveloped flow, this paper focuses on optimizing the training process and introducing a data correction method named “coordinate” technology. For the training dataset, the k-field and ɛ-field are automatically corrected by using this technology when the flow state deviates from the theoretical estimation of the standard k − ɛ model. Based on the coordinate technology, a source term of the equation is built by deep learning, and the simulation error is reduced by 6.2% compared to the uncoordinated one. The results confirm that the coordinate technology can effectively adapt to the undeveloped flow where the standard k − ɛ model is not suited and improve the accuracy of the data-driven RANS modeling when dealing with complex flows.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Modification of Spalart–Allmaras model with consideration of turbulence energy backscatter using velocity helicity10.1016/j.physleta.2011.05.023 ↗
2. Subgrid-scale helicity equation model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows10.1063/5.0038165 ↗
3. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows10.2514/6.1992-439 ↗
4. Estimation of turbulence closure coefficients for data centers using machine learning algorithms10.1109/ITHERM.2012.6231411 ↗
5. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2 ↗
6. Large eddy simulations of wall jets with coflow for the study of turbulent Prandtl number variations and data-driven modeling10.1103/physrevfluids.5.064501 ↗
7. Formulating turbulence closures using sparse regression with embedded form invariance10.1103/physrevfluids.5.084611 ↗
8. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks10.1126/science.1127647 ↗
9. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
10. Searching for turbulence models by artificial neural network10.1103/physrevfluids.2.054604 ↗
11. Predictions of turbulent shear flows using deep neural networks10.1103/physrevfluids.4.054603 ↗
12. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance10.1017/jfm.2016.615 ↗
13. Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils10.1063/1.5061693 ↗
14. Physical invariance in neural networks for subgrid-scale scalar flux modeling10.1103/physrevfluids.6.024607 ↗
15. Experiment of turbulent flow in rotating smooth channel using tow dimensional hotwire10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.07.006 ↗
16. Calculation of turbulence-driven secondary motion in non-circular ducts10.1017/s0022112084000574 ↗
17. On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows10.1017/s0022112093002034 ↗
18. Inverse cascades and resonant triads in rotating and stratified turbulence10.1063/1.5001740 ↗
19. Inverse energy cascade in nonlocal helical shell models of turbulence10.1103/PhysRevE.92.043021 ↗
20. Forward and inverse kinetic energy cascades in Jupiter's turbulent weather layer10.1038/nphys4227 ↗
21. Direct and inverse energy cascades in a forced rotating turbulence experiment10.1063/1.4904957 ↗
22. Inverse energy cascade in three-dimensional isotropic turbulence10.1103/physrevlett.108.164501 ↗
23. Some characteristics of small-scale turbulence in a turbulent duct flow10.1017/s0022112091000526 ↗
24. 2000
25. Estimation of the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy: A review10.1016/j.ces.2020.116133 ↗
26. Freely decaying turbulence in a finite domain at finite Reynolds number10.1063/5.0015009 ↗
27. Turbulence closure for high Reynolds number airfoil flows by deep neural networks10.1016/j.ast.2020.106452 ↗
28. A priori assessment of prediction confidence for data-driven turbulence modeling10.1007/s10494-017-9807-0 ↗
29. Wall model based on neural networks for LES of turbulent flows over periodic hills10.1103/physrevfluids.6.054610 ↗
30. Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation10.1145/2939672.2939738 ↗
31. 1990
32. foilNET: A Convolution based Neural Network for Prediction of Pressure Field around Oscillating Airfoils
33. 2015
34. Modeling the pressure-Hessian tensor using deep neural networks10.1103/physrevfluids.5.114604 ↗
35. Modeling subgrid-scale force and divergence of heat flux of compressible isotropic turbulence by artificial neural network10.1103/physrevfluids.4.104605 ↗
36. Modeling subgrid-scale forces by spatial artificial neural networks in large eddy simulation of turbulence10.1103/physrevfluids.5.054606 ↗
37. Perspectives on machine learning-augmented Reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulation models of turbulence10.1103/physrevfluids.6.050504 ↗
38. New Approaches in Turbulence and Transition Modeling Using Data-driven Techniques10.2514/6.2015-1284 ↗
39. Data-driven discovery of closure models10.1137/18m1177263 ↗
40. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations10.1126/science.aaw4741 ↗
41. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
42. Physics-informed deep neural networks for learning parameters and constitutive relationships in subsurface flow problems10.1029/2019wr026731 ↗
43. NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951 ↗
44. Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603 ↗
45. 2013
46. 2014
47. Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification10.1109/ICCV.2015.123 ↗
48. The expressive power of neural networks: A view from the width
49. Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion
50. Deep residual learning for image recognition10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
51. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
52. D. P. Kingma, and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
53. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:gcewtp>2.3.co;2 ↗
54. See https://github.com/Akagiiii/Coordinate_V1 for “Coordinate_V1.”