journal article·2020-09-01Open access

Shock wave in one-dimensional dusty plasma crystal with charge gradient

Q. L. Niu, M. Tian, H. Chen

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 9

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of charge gradient in a one-dimensional dusty plasma crystal is considered to investigate shock structure. Under the continuum limit, the nonlinear Korteweg–de Vries (KdV)–Burgers equation with a charge gradient effect is derived using the reductive perturbation method. Then, the shock solution based on the KdV–Burgers equation is obtained. The influence of the parameter ε, which measures the effect of charge gradient on the dynamic of the shock wave, is discussed in detail. It is found that the shock amplitude and strength increase with the increase in the parameter ε. Furthermore, it is also found that charge gradient effect makes oscillatory shock more easily converted to monotonic shock.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Nonlinear Waves and Solitons

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Nanchang University 1 , Nanchang 330047, China

Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Fusion and Information Control 2 , Nanchang 330031, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 2002
2. Phys.-Usp. · 2004 · 47 · 44710.1070/pu2004v047n05abeh001689 ↗
3. Phys. Fliuds. · 1986 · 29 · 176410.1063/1.865653 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 400910.1103/physrevlett.72.4009 ↗
5. Phys. Lett. A · 1994 · 191 · 30110.1016/0375-9601(94)90144-9 ↗
6. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 · 1994 · 33 · L47610.1143/jjap.33.l476 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 73 · 65210.1103/physrevlett.73.652 ↗
8. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 01501010.1063/1.5011386 ↗
9. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 12521610.1063/1.5124131 ↗
10. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 10370810.1063/1.4966203 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 73 · 05640410.1103/physreve.73.056404 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 71 · 04641010.1103/physreve.71.046410 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. E · 2004 · 69 · 03641010.1103/physreve.69.036410 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 25500310.1103/physrevlett.91.255003 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 121910.1103/physrevlett.86.1219 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 09500310.1103/physrevlett.100.095003 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 15500110.1103/physrevlett.106.155001 ↗
18. Phys. Plasmas · 1996 · 3 · 389010.1063/1.871577 ↗
19. Phys. Plasmas · 1999 · 6 · 40910.1063/1.873295 ↗
20. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 05521610.1063/5.0005409 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. E · 2003 · 68 · 04640210.1103/physreve.68.046402 ↗
22. New J. Phys. · 2003 · 5 · 7410.1088/1367-2630/5/1/374 ↗
23. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 11370510.1063/1.4967272 ↗
24. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 09370510.1063/1.4962685 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 16500310.1103/physrevlett.104.165003 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 25500410.1103/physrevlett.92.255004 ↗
27. Phys. Plamas · 2005 · 12 · 09230610.1063/1.2041649 ↗
28. Contrib. Plasma. Phys. · 2008 · 48 · 56910.1002/ctpp.200810090 ↗
29. JETP Lett. · 2008 · 87 · 28110.1134/s0021364008060039 ↗
30. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 · 2019 · 58 · 11600210.7567/1347-4065/ab497f ↗
31. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 04210710.1063/1.3377786 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. E · 2001 · 64 · 04640310.1103/physreve.64.046403 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 05500310.1103/physrevlett.99.055003 ↗
34. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 · 2013 · 52 · 05020510.7567/jjap.52.050205 ↗
35. Plasma. Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 20 · 04500110.1088/2058-6272/aaaadb ↗
36. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 08371210.1063/1.5041953 ↗
37. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 04523210.1063/1.5144901 ↗
38. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 12504510.1063/1.4972520 ↗
39. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 11520510.1063/1.5130443 ↗
40. Phys. Plasmas · 2019 · 26 · 08370110.1063/1.5115346 ↗
41. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 346910.1103/physrevlett.83.3649 ↗