journal article·2024-04-01Open access

Fabrication of nanofiber yarns via electro-blown and hang-fiber process

Jun Zeng, Ying Chen, Guojie Xu, Zhuohao Shi, Zhifeng Luo, Fengbin Liu, Xiaojie Chen, Zebiao Zou, Han Wang, Zhiyun Du

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 4

Abstract

Continuous nanofiber yarns were prepared using the electro-blown and hanging yarn process. Unlike typical electrospinning devices, this method uniquely controls the spinning process to induce the hanging phenomenon, and the resulting hanging yarn is twisted to form nanofiber yarns. A polyvinylidene fluoride nanofiber yarn was successfully prepared using the electro-blown and hanging yarn process. Scanning electron microscopy observations confirmed that the nanofibers prepared by this method exhibited good orientation within the yarn. The results indicate that the conductivity of the polymer solution and the applied voltage are crucial for inducing the hanging yarn process, ensuring stable continuous spinning. A possible mechanism is proposed, suggesting that adjusting the solution’s conductivity and controlling the spinning voltage can utilize defects in the yarn-hanging process during spinning to prepare nanofiber yarns.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Precision Electronic Manufacturing Technology and Equipment, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology 1 , Guangzhou 510006, China

School of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangdong University of Technology 2 , Guangzhou 510006, China

Funding

Jihua Laboratory · National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangdong Joint Fund

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2020 · 561 · 9310.1016/j.jcis.2019.11.059 ↗
2. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2019 · 136 · 4720610.1002/app.47206 ↗
3. Polym. Rev. · 2017 · 57 · 46710.1080/15583724.2017.1309664 ↗
4. Eur. Polym. J. · 2018 · 105 · 22710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.05.033 ↗
5. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2018 · 108 · 126110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.035 ↗
6. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2019 · 126 · 71710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.155 ↗
7. Sens. Actuators, B · 2010 · 149 · 2810.1016/j.snb.2010.06.039 ↗
8. Sens. Actuators, B · 2014 · 203 · 33310.1016/j.snb.2014.06.101 ↗
9. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 49210.1002/adfm.201302344 ↗
10. Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 486510.1002/adma.201502133 ↗
11. Biosensors · 2022 · 12 · 17710.3390/bios12030177 ↗
12. Biomater. Sci. · 2020 · 8 · 357410.1039/d0bm00157k ↗
13. Acta Biomater. · 2021 · 128 · 6010.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.047 ↗
14. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 2441510.1021/acsami.6b06825 ↗
15. Macromol. Mater. Eng. · 2021 · 306 · 210035910.1002/mame.202100359 ↗
16. Cellulose · 2016 · 24 · 21910.1007/s10570-016-1099-3 ↗
17. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 1816510.1021/acsami.1c03658 ↗
18. Phys. Fluids · 2002 · 14 · 391210.1063/1.1510664 ↗