Impact analysis of cavity length on transfer cavity frequency locking system for atomic inertial measurement device
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, an efficient method for frequency stabilization of a highly off-resonant laser in a spin-exchange relaxation-free atomic inertial sensor is proposed. This was accomplished via the use of an optical resonator that transferred the stability of an atomic energy level to the laser frequency. The pump laser frequency was stabilized via saturation absorption spectroscopy and was used as a reference to lock the large-detuned probe laser with a double transmission Fabry–Pérot (FP) cavity. The frequency stability and bandwidth of the entire transfer cavity frequency locking system were investigated, and the results were used to elucidate the effect of cavity length on stability. The frequency stability of the system approached 1.66 × 10−11 when the FP cavity length was 30 mm. This method can be applied to a variety of ultrasensitive atomic physics experiments, such as for precision spectroscopy and laser cooling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum optics and atomic interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronics Engineering, Beihang University 1 , 37 College Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences 2 , No. 10 Xibeiwangdong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China · The National Key R&D Program of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Electron. Lett. · 1980 · 16 · 63010.1049/el:19800437 ↗
2. Adv. Opt. Photonics · 2015 · 7 · 6610.1364/aop.7.000066 ↗
3. Quantum Electron. · 2015 · 45 · 7810.1070/qe2015v045n01abeh015420 ↗
4. Sensors · 2012 · 15 · 633110.3390/s120506331 ↗
5. Nat. Photonics · 2007 · 1 · 61310.1038/nphoton.2007.209 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 13080110.1103/physrevlett.89.130801 ↗
7. Opt. Lett. · 2011 · 36 · 6410.1364/ol.36.000064 ↗
8. Opt. Eng. · 2005 · 44 · 09050510.1117/1.2042457 ↗
9. Opt. Lett. · 1991 · 16 · 7910.1364/ol.16.000079 ↗
10. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2016 · 87 · 06310910.1063/1.4953589 ↗
11. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 28 · L183910.1143/jjap.28.l1839 ↗
12. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1991 · 62 · 165610.1063/1.1142452 ↗
13. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2006 · 77 · 09310510.1063/1.2337094 ↗
14. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2002 · 73 · 254410.1063/1.1487895 ↗
15. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1998 · 69 · 373710.1063/1.1149171 ↗
16. Opt. Lett. · 1980 · 5 · 1510.1364/ol.5.000015 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. A · 2006 · 73 · 06250910.1103/physreva.73.062509 ↗
18. Appl. Opt. · 1998 · 37 · 329510.1364/ao.37.003295 ↗
19. Opt. Lett. · 2002 · 27 · 190510.1364/ol.27.001905 ↗
20. Pramana J. Phys. · 2005 · 65 · 40310.1007/bf02704199 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 61 · 189510.1063/1.108381 ↗
22. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 35 · 27610.1143/jjap.35.276 ↗
23. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 08540110.1088/0953-4075/49/8/085401 ↗
24. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 44 · 22910.1143/jjap.44.229 ↗
25. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 42 · L33210.1143/jjap.42.l332 ↗
26. Opt. Pura Apl. · 2018 · 51 · 5001410.7149/opa.51.3.50014 ↗
27. Opt. Express · 2014 · 22 · 1064210.1364/oe.22.010642 ↗
28. Am. J. Phys. · 2001 · 69 · 7910.1119/1.1286663 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. B · 1983 · 31 · 9710.1007/bf00702605 ↗
30. Chin. Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 8 · 49610.3788/col20100805.0496 ↗
31. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2011 · 291 · 01204310.1088/1742-6596/291/1/012043 ↗
32. Appl. Opt. · 1991 · 30 · 164810.1364/ao.30.001648 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. A · 2006 · 74 · 05380110.1103/physreva.74.053801 ↗