journal article·2020-01-01Open access

Impact analysis of cavity length on transfer cavity frequency locking system for atomic inertial measurement device

Xiufei Li, Zitong Xu, Yueyang Zhai, Yan Yin, Xiaolin Ning, Wei Quan

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

In this work, an efficient method for frequency stabilization of a highly off-resonant laser in a spin-exchange relaxation-free atomic inertial sensor is proposed. This was accomplished via the use of an optical resonator that transferred the stability of an atomic energy level to the laser frequency. The pump laser frequency was stabilized via saturation absorption spectroscopy and was used as a reference to lock the large-detuned probe laser with a double transmission Fabry–Pérot (FP) cavity. The frequency stability and bandwidth of the entire transfer cavity frequency locking system were investigated, and the results were used to elucidate the effect of cavity length on stability. The frequency stability of the system approached 1.66 × 10−11 when the FP cavity length was 30 mm. This method can be applied to a variety of ultrasensitive atomic physics experiments, such as for precision spectroscopy and laser cooling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum optics and atomic interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronics Engineering, Beihang University 1 , 37 College Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China

Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences 2 , No. 10 Xibeiwangdong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China · The National Key R&D Program of China

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Electron. Lett. · 1980 · 16 · 63010.1049/el:19800437 ↗
2. Adv. Opt. Photonics · 2015 · 7 · 6610.1364/aop.7.000066 ↗
3. Quantum Electron. · 2015 · 45 · 7810.1070/qe2015v045n01abeh015420 ↗
4. Sensors · 2012 · 15 · 633110.3390/s120506331 ↗
5. Nat. Photonics · 2007 · 1 · 61310.1038/nphoton.2007.209 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 13080110.1103/physrevlett.89.130801 ↗
7. Opt. Lett. · 2011 · 36 · 6410.1364/ol.36.000064 ↗
8. Opt. Eng. · 2005 · 44 · 09050510.1117/1.2042457 ↗
9. Opt. Lett. · 1991 · 16 · 7910.1364/ol.16.000079 ↗
10. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2016 · 87 · 06310910.1063/1.4953589 ↗
11. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 28 · L183910.1143/jjap.28.l1839 ↗
12. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1991 · 62 · 165610.1063/1.1142452 ↗
13. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2006 · 77 · 09310510.1063/1.2337094 ↗
14. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2002 · 73 · 254410.1063/1.1487895 ↗
15. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1998 · 69 · 373710.1063/1.1149171 ↗
16. Opt. Lett. · 1980 · 5 · 1510.1364/ol.5.000015 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. A · 2006 · 73 · 06250910.1103/physreva.73.062509 ↗
18. Appl. Opt. · 1998 · 37 · 329510.1364/ao.37.003295 ↗
19. Opt. Lett. · 2002 · 27 · 190510.1364/ol.27.001905 ↗
20. Pramana J. Phys. · 2005 · 65 · 40310.1007/bf02704199 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 61 · 189510.1063/1.108381 ↗
22. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 35 · 27610.1143/jjap.35.276 ↗
23. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 08540110.1088/0953-4075/49/8/085401 ↗
24. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 44 · 22910.1143/jjap.44.229 ↗
25. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 42 · L33210.1143/jjap.42.l332 ↗
26. Opt. Pura Apl. · 2018 · 51 · 5001410.7149/opa.51.3.50014 ↗
27. Opt. Express · 2014 · 22 · 1064210.1364/oe.22.010642 ↗
28. Am. J. Phys. · 2001 · 69 · 7910.1119/1.1286663 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. B · 1983 · 31 · 9710.1007/bf00702605 ↗
30. Chin. Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 8 · 49610.3788/col20100805.0496 ↗
31. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2011 · 291 · 01204310.1088/1742-6596/291/1/012043 ↗
32. Appl. Opt. · 1991 · 30 · 164810.1364/ao.30.001648 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. A · 2006 · 74 · 05380110.1103/physreva.74.053801 ↗