Effect of ingot cooling rate on Cu distribution and magnetic properties of Sm(CobalFe0.28Cu0.07Zr0.03)7.6 magnets
Source abstract
Abstract
The Sm(CobalFe0.28Cu0.07Zr0.03)7.6 magnets were made by a casting process with two different cooling rates. X-ray diffraction analysis shows that the main phase of the two as-cast alloys consist of 1:5, 1:7, and 2:17 (hexagonal) phase. While a few of rhombohedral 2:17 phases appear in the ingots with the lower cooling rate. The electron probe micro-analysis and corresponding wavelength dispersive x-ray results indicate that a higher cooling rate of the as-cast alloy is helpful to the uniformity of Cu element distribution in the ingots and magnets, especially for suppressing the formation of 2:17 R phase in ingots. The coercivity and squareness of magnet prepared from ingot with higher cooling rate increase by 72 and 48 percentage, respectively. The microstructure observation shows that some cell boundaries are destroyed in the magnet made by lower cooling rate, while the cell boundaries are well developed in the magnet made by higher cooling rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Materials, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing University of Technology 1 , Beijing 100124, China
Center for the Physics of Materials, and Department of Physics, McGill University 2 , 3600 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T8, Canada
Funding
National NAtural Science Foundation of China · International S&T Cooperation Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Alloys Compd. · 1996 · 241 · 21610.1016/0925-8388(96)02308-0 ↗
2. Acta Mater · 2018 · 154 · 34310.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.046 ↗
3. Scripta Mater · 2017 · 132 · 4410.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.01.026 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 82110.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1977 · 13 · 131710.1109/tmag.1977.1059703 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 251710.1063/1.328987 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 1984 · 55 · 209110.1063/1.333574 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 672110.1063/1.367762 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 167010.1063/1.369304 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 124310.1063/1.1450253 ↗
11. Phys. B · 2002 · 319 · 12210.1016/s0921-4526(02)01113-4 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 96 · 653410.1063/1.1809250 ↗
13. Acta Mater · 2019 · 164 · 19610.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.046 ↗
14. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 474 · 41710.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.008 ↗
15. Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 73710.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.015 ↗
16. Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 24310.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.066 ↗
17. Acta Mater · 2017 · 126 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.050 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17C704-110.1063/1.4906757 ↗
19. J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 741 · 49510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.164 ↗
20. Scr. Mater. · 2018 · 146 · 23110.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.12.007 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1999 · 35 · 332510.1109/20.800513 ↗
22. Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 99710.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.026 ↗
23. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2017 · 53 · 210200410.1109/tmag.2017.2690871 ↗
24. J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 753 · 16210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.222 ↗
25. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2013 · 49 · 322110.1109/tmag.2013.2247576 ↗
26. J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 735 · 197110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.009 ↗