journal article·2018-11-01Open access

Morphology dependence of low temperatures exchange bias Co/CoO core-shell nanoparticles/spheres by eco-friendly solvothermal route

Beibei Guo, Yanling Xu, Shaomin Zhou

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 11

Abstract

The present work reports the magnetic effect of particle shape and magnetic property in a Co/CoO core-shell exchange bias system. Co/CoO core-shell nanoparticles/spheres (NPSs) of different sizes including spherical and octahedral morphologies were prepared by the decomposition of cobalt acetate under eco-friendly solvothermal conditions. Spherical and octahedral Co/CoO NPSs all display superparamagnetism at room temperature due to the superparamagnetic critical size of cobalt. And it can be seen in hysteresis loop patterns that the saturation magnetization (MS) values of the Co/CoO NPSs are 100.6, 76.1, and 75.9 emu/g, whose diameters are about 16, 200 and 300 nm, respectively. In addition, all of spherical Co/CoO NPSs reveal exchange bias field at low temperature, whereas octahedral ones disappear because excessive PVP inhibits the formation of exchange coupling interface between ferromagnetic Co and antiferromagnetic CoO. These results were only observed after field cooling at 5 T.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory for Special Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, Henan University , Kaifeng 475004, China

Funding

Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Teamin University · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 4
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 26720410.1103/physrevlett.119.267204 ↗
3. Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 65510.1038/nmat4331 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 13250910.1063/1.3240402 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 17720510.1103/physrevlett.109.177205 ↗
6. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. · 2016 · 8 · 2815910.1021/acsami.6b08532 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 4
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 02250210.1063/1.2959727 ↗
9. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. · 2016 · 8 · 2247710.1021/acsami.6b05588 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B. · 2014 · 89 · 8
11. Phys. Rev. B. · 2007 · 76 · 18442310.1103/physrevb.76.184423 ↗
12. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 453610.1088/0022-3727/39/21/003 ↗
13. Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 244710.1039/c3nr05238a ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 21720510.1103/physrevlett.96.217205 ↗
15. J. Mater. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 1827910.1039/c1jm12990b ↗
16. Phys. Rep.-Rev. Sec. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 422 · 6510.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.004 ↗
17. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 3050710.1039/c6cp05099a ↗
18. Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 116 · 1047310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00687 ↗
19. Nanotechnology · 2016 · 27 · 9
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 115 · 6
21. J. Energy. Chem. · 2017 · 26 · 121010.1016/j.jechem.2017.08.014 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 10390310.1063/1.4986415 ↗